
Vancouver attorney Angus Lee believes the future of our community hinges on active civic participation
D. Angus Lee
For Clark County Today
Visualize, for a moment, the picturesque landscapes that once defined Clark County. From vibrant parks buzzing with mothers and children to pristine streets, this was a place that epitomized community spirit. But in recent years, there’s an undeniable shadow that has been cast on this vision – the proliferation of “day camping.”

For those of us with deep roots in Clark County, the changes have been startling. The bustling streets of yore now echo with caution. The iconic park near the Marshall Center, which once resonated with the laughter of children, has become a no-go zone for many mothers. The very essence of community safety and cleanliness seems to have been eroded.
Central to this decline are the “day camps,” which have swiftly become synonymous with crime, squalor, and disorder. Far from being innocuous shelters, these tents have been linked to drug distribution, criminal activity, and even death. Speak to any seasoned patrol officer or detective, and the narrative is consistent: these street tents are perilous to public safety.
Now, here’s where the urgent need for action crystallizes: The Clark County Council is actively deliberating the adoption of a local county code to ban day camping. This is a pivotal moment, and your voice, my dear friend, could make all the difference.
However, it’s crucial to debunk a persistent myth that these encampments have legal protection. Critics often cite the 2019 U.S. Court of Appeals ruling in Martin v. City of Boise to assert that the local government lacks the authority to restrict day camping. This is a gross misrepresentation. The court in Martin only asserted that individuals cannot be criminally prosecuted for sleeping outside on public property when they lack alternative shelter options. It made no mention of allowing permanent street tents. In fact, the Court clearly stated that the ruling does not prevent cities from regulating placement of tents.
What’s at stake isn’t just the aesthetic beauty of Clark County or its majestic Pacific Northwest landscapes. It’s about rectifying a blight that has gripped our community. With the potential for legislation to criminalize the unattended placement of tents on public property during the day, we have a tangible solution at hand.
The time to act is now my friend. Contact the County Council. Tell them we want clean and vibrant streets, not day camps. Make your voice heard and lend your steadfast support to the proposed ban on day camping. The future of our community hinges on active civic participation. Together, we can ensure the magnificent dawn of a renewed Clark County.
County Council Email:
- karen.bowerman@clark.wa.gov
- glen.yung@clark.wa.gov
- michelle.belkot@clark.wa.gov
- gary.medvigy@clark.wa.gov
- sue.marshall@clark.wa.gov
Also read:
- POLL: The IBR project is described as only 30% designed and 30% funded after more than six years of work. How confident are you in the current management of the IBR program?IBR’s cost has climbed from $3.2–$4.8B to $15.2B while the project remains 30% designed and 30% funded.
- Opinion: Two bridges, one expanding billBracchi traces how the IBR’s estimated cost grew from roughly $3B to $14.4B as Vancouver’s Bridge Shelter adds millions in annual operating costs alongside existing homelessness programs.
- Opinion: WFSE demands a ‘fair’ contract — but workers and taxpayers can’t see the numbersElizabeth New (Hovde) argues neither state workers nor taxpayers can evaluate what is “fair” when wage proposals and their costs remain undisclosed.
- Opinion: Washington’s ‘regressive’ tax debate ignores where people and money are movingWashington Policy Center’s Ryan Frost argues the state’s operating budget rose from $33.6B to $80.2B, driving new taxes and worsening competitiveness.
- Opinion: Trump Is Winning. Can You Name Five Wins?Nancy Churchill lists Trump-era policy wins on taxes, border, ranching, and energy ahead of midterm elections.







