
Elizabeth Hovde of the Washington Policy Center believes lawmakers should stop digging a PFML hole, admit the program harms more workers than it helps, and let workers in our state keep more of their incomes
Elizabeth Hovde
Washington Policy Center
Some employers are wisely preparing their employees for an increased payroll deduction. The culprit for workers’ decreased wages in this instance is the state’s struggling Paid Family and Medical Leave (PFML) program.

The amount workers pay for the social program — that many will never need or use — went up this month, doubling the payroll tax rate initially allocated when PFML legislation passed in 2017. A tax rate on workers and employers of 0.4 percent is now 0.8 percent. Why? More people used the program than expected, supply has not kept up with demand and the fund is in trouble. If you build it, they will come — and workers did.
Senate Bill 5286, which would modify details of the tax’s funding formula to help it pay its way better in the future, is rightly moving in the Legislature. The new formula is expected to help keep the program out of the red — that is along with the unfortunate doubling of the payroll tax and a recent $350-million legislative bailout from the general fund. (SB 5286 is bipartisan and helpful, but it’s not at all celebratory. It simply rearranges deck chairs on this Titanic.)
If you want to see how much you and your employer will pay for this program that helps people in need and people not in need — while encouraging workers not to save for life’s decisions and emergencies and instead rely on the government — use this payment calculator, available on the PFML website. Employers will continue to report each employee’s total gross wages, not including tips, and collect the tax up to a Social Security cap of $160,200 in 2023.
There is nothing you need to do, human resource specialists inform their employees — other than cry, I say.
In a time where inflation is cruelly biting at family budgets, many workers could have used the hundreds of dollars every year that will be going to people who sometimes have higher incomes than they do. And a tax for long-term care will take away even more of a worker’s earnings in July. Get ready.
We do and should have safety nets for people in need, even when their own decisions and lack of preparation put them there. PFML, however, expands a safety net far too wide and hurts people’s ability to be self-sufficient.
Lawmakers should stop digging a PFML hole, admit the program harms more workers than it helps, and let workers in our state keep more of their incomes.
Elizabeth Hovde is a policy analyst and the director of the Centers for Health Care and Worker Rights at the Washington Policy Center. She is a Clark County resident.
Also read:
- Letter: Local politicians have ignored repeated votes against light rail and a county resolution opposing light railClark County voters rejected light rail in 2012 and again passed a 68% advisory vote against it in 2013 — but the fight continues.
- Letter: ‘Our local leaders should be advocating and making those opportunities countywide to translate into housing opportunities for our veterans’A Clark County Army veteran argues HUD-VASH vouchers fail veterans when landlords countywide won’t accept them.
- Opinion: C-TRAN outpaces TriMet – Strong finances and growing ridership, but a cautionary note on costs and efficiencyC-TRAN’s farebox recovery has dropped from 17% in 2017 to just 4.2% in 2025, even as reserves top $201 million.
- POLL: Should Rep. Marie Gluesenkamp Perez publicly state her position on Washington’s new income tax?The RNC and Sen. John Braun say voters deserve a clear answer from Rep. Gluesenkamp Perez on Washington’s new income tax.
- Opinion: “Letting the camel’s nose into the tent; Reject the income taxRep. John Ley warns a “temporary” 9.9% state income tax follows a pattern of taxes that never expire.







