Regardless of the new study, Elizabeth Hovde of the Washington Policy Center states why it’s important for all of us to reflect on how tax rates rise over time
Elizabeth Hovde
Washington Policy Center
A meeting Friday morning about the WA Cares’ Fund highlighted hope that the state’s long-term-care program is now projected to remain solvent with its current payroll tax rate, given the latest actuarial analysis. A study done two years ago — before taxpayers knew about WA Cares and before widespread concern about how the program will add a new payroll tax — showed insolvency. Washington state officials were concerned about the fund being able to pay its way.
Sen. Curtis King, R-Yakima, sits on the Long-Term Services and Supports (LTSS) Trust Commission and still has valid concerns.
After asking for clarification about some of the study’s finer points, including whether or not the study’s positive outcome has the law being amended to allow people who pay into WA Cares for years to see a benefit if they move out of state (it did not), King said: “I have to tell you that I’m skeptical that we can do a financial analysis or the Milliman analysis and have it come out so that we end up at .58, which is where we wanted it to be and where we started.”
Regardless of the new study, it’s important for all of us to reflect on how tax rates rise over time. For example, the payroll tax rate for the state’s paid family and medical leave has doubled in just a few short years. We should be aware that allowing a new tax for a fund that won’t help solve our long-term-care crisis in the way promised is asking for more of the same.
See more about the tax’s cost-shifting and misplaced burden on low-income wage earners, as well as the long-term-care program’s inadequate and “maybe you’ll see it” lifetime benefit, here. Past and future meeting information for the commission overseeing the state’s long-term-care law and a payroll tax that begins in July 2023 is available here.
Elizabeth Hovde is a policy analyst and the director of the Centers for Health Care and Worker Rights at the Washington Policy Center. She is a Clark County resident.
Also read:
- Letter: How do we share a city and foster community when our sincerely held moral frameworks clash so fundamentally?
Matson argues Battle Ground’s council lacks the mandate to adjudicate sexual ethics or act as the town’s spiritual leader. - Letter: When ‘inclusion’ mandates exclusion, sports lose its way
Jonathan Hines argues forced Pride jerseys and banned Bible verses reveal a double standard in MLB’s inclusion policies. - POLL: Did the Clark County Council make the right decision by rejecting the auditor authority proposal?
The 3-2 council vote rejected giving the auditor’s office power to write financial impact statements for ballot measures. - Opinion: Hospital price transparency is good, but its impact will be limited
Washington still shields hospitals from competition through certificate-of-need laws other states have repealed. - Opinion: Washington tax collections are running below forecast as the economy softens
Washington’s tax collections are $135.4 million behind forecast since February as employment and revenue both slip.
