
Target Zero Manager Doug Dahl answers a question about what the law says about children riding motorcycles in neighborhoods
Doug Dahl, manager
Target Zero
Q: I’ve noticed a proliferation of children riding small (but loud!) motorcycles around the neighborhood. Usually up and down the same street until presumably either their fuel runs out or their mother calls them in for dinner. Sometimes they have helmets, sometimes not. What does the law say about this kind of activity?
A: If I were 12 years old and had access to a pocket bike, I’d definitely want to ride it on the road. Twelve-year-old boys are kind of dumb that way. So parents, this one’s on you, both legally and as the responsible adult.

First, the legal stuff. We’re dealing with two parts here; the vehicle and the rider. You described the motorcycles as small and loud. The small part suggests they’re not a typical street-legal motorcycle, and the loud part indicates they’re not electric bikes. I’m guessing these are pocket bikes, mini versions of full-sized motorcycles. Pocket bikes don’t reach even the lowest bar for a street-legal gas-powered two-wheeler, the moped. Although many pocket bikes meet the 50-cc engine size limit for mopeds, they fall short on the safety end of things. Mopeds are required to have (and this is a partial list) mirrors, brakes, controls, headlight, taillight, brake light, tires, and muffler. Pocket bikes have substandard equipment (brakes, tires, controls) or lack them completely (mirrors, lights, muffler).
The other clear giveaway that a pocket bike isn’t street-legal: no license plate. Mopeds are required to be registered, and you won’t get a registration for a pocket bike if it doesn’t meet the safety requirements.
But let’s imagine that someone was able to find a pocket bike that met all the requirements for a moped and had it registered to ride on the road. That doesn’t make it legal for a child to ride it. A moped rider must be at least 16 and have a valid driver license. Riders must also wear a helmet.
There’s one more law I should mention, and this one is for the parents. It’s unlawful to allow your child to operate a motor vehicle on a public roadway “when such minor is not authorized hereunder or in violation of any of the provisions of this chapter.” In case you’re wondering about what’s in “this chapter,” it’s all the stuff mentioned in the previous paragraphs.
To summarize the potential legal consequences, the kid could get arrested for driving without a license, the parent could get an infraction for allowing their child to ride the pocket bike on the road, and the police could impound the pocket bike because it was operated by an unlicensed rider.
As inconvenient as they are, I’m less concerned about the legal consequences than the physical risks to a kid on a pocket bike. Looking back on my 12-year-old days, I didn’t have the judgment to make good decisions while riding my bike down the street. (Like the time I tried to jump a ramp built out of a sheet of plywood and a garbage can, crashing gloriously in the center of the road.) If I’d have had access to a bike with a motor, I’d have made the same bad decisions, but twice as fast.
Tragically, reality bears out that other kids also aren’t conscious of the risks. A quick internet search for kids crashing on pocket bikes returns too many responses of serious injury and fatal crashes. Pocket bikes can be fun, but a kid on an overpowered tiny motorcycle shouldn’t be competing with traffic on public roads. If you kid wants to ride a pocket bike, keep them off the road.
TheWiseDrive is hosted by Doug Dahl, a Target Zero manager for the Washington Traffic Safety Commission.

Also read:
- Opinion: Gov. Ferguson has abandoned his own tax relief demandsRyan Frost of the Washington Policy Center argues that Gov. Bob Ferguson’s support for the state’s proposed income tax contradicts his earlier demands for broader taxpayer relief.
- Opinion: Many important decisions looming as the 2026 session nears the endRep. John Ley outlines budget concerns, energy policy debates and several tax proposals as the 2026 legislative session approaches its final days.
- Opinion: 106 striking workers already using unemployment insurance benefitsA Washington Policy Center analyst says the state’s new law allowing striking workers to collect unemployment benefits is already affecting the UI system.
- POLL: Who should have the primary say in decisions about a student’s gender identity at school?Clark County Today is asking readers who should have the primary role in decisions about a student’s gender identity at school.
- Opinion: Study shows 2025’s record tax increases reduce Washington’s GDP growth and worker payTodd Myers writes that a new economic analysis projects Washington’s 2025 tax increases will slow GDP growth and reduce wages over the next several years.







