Sen. John Braun shares results of an audit by the U.S. Department of Education which found that Washington state school officials had little oversight in how they spent student funding
Sen. John Braun
20th Legislative District
An audit by the U.S. Department of Education found that Washington state school officials had little oversight in how school districts spent $1 billion in student funding, 20% of which was intended to help students catch up from learning loss as a result of COVID shutdowns.
The Seattle Times reported that state Superintendent of Public Instruction Chris Reykdal said he thought the districts’ reporting was in compliance with federal law, but the reports the office of Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI) posted were found to be insufficient.
Even now, the language OSPI posted to explain how districts used the money is fewer than 50 words.
The audit also found that the state did not adequately monitor if the interventions meant to help students catch up were successful.
“Students are still behind. If there were more opportunities to weigh in, and transparency around what districts are doing, the funds may have been used in a way that’s more effective for students.” – Katie Silberstein, strategic projects lead for the Edunomics Lab, a Georgetown University department that researches education finance.
Public trust in government is very low and it’s easy to see why when we find out that those who are entrusted to spend your money in specific ways, such as helping our kids recover academically, do so with a lack of accountability and poor follow-through.
A study ordered by the Washington State Legislature, conducted in May, found that 74% of school’s federal aid expenditures are classified as “other,” making it harder to verify how the money was spent.
This is unacceptable. Superintendent Reykdal should be monitoring our school districts’ reporting more closely. If he can’t ensure we spend federal dollars as we are required to do so, it could jeopardize such aid in the future. Our students deserve better.
Also read:
- POLL: The IBR project is described as only 30% designed and 30% funded after more than six years of work. How confident are you in the current management of the IBR program?
IBR’s cost has climbed from $3.2–$4.8B to $15.2B while the project remains 30% designed and 30% funded. - Opinion: Two bridges, one expanding bill
Bracchi traces how the IBR’s estimated cost grew from roughly $3B to $14.4B as Vancouver’s Bridge Shelter adds millions in annual operating costs alongside existing homelessness programs. - Opinion: WFSE demands a ‘fair’ contract — but workers and taxpayers can’t see the numbers
Elizabeth New (Hovde) argues neither state workers nor taxpayers can evaluate what is “fair” when wage proposals and their costs remain undisclosed. - Opinion: Washington’s ‘regressive’ tax debate ignores where people and money are moving
Washington Policy Center’s Ryan Frost argues the state’s operating budget rose from $33.6B to $80.2B, driving new taxes and worsening competitiveness. - Opinion: Trump Is Winning. Can You Name Five Wins?
Nancy Churchill lists Trump-era policy wins on taxes, border, ranching, and energy ahead of midterm elections.
wpDiscuz
