Opinion: Is it time for a new game plan?

In her weekly column, Nancy Churchill assesses the election results in Washington state.

In her weekly column, Nancy Churchill assesses the election results in Washington state

Nancy Churchill
Dangerous Rhetoric

My friends and neighbors are all asking me “What happened to the Washington Red Wave?” As conservatives across the state of Washington review the extremely disappointing state election results, many are discouraged. Republican leaders knew it would be tough, but they thought we had a chance to pick up some ground, especially in the State Legislature.

Nancy Churchill
Nancy Churchill

We won’t have the final results until Nov. 29 when the elections are certified, but things are looking very bleak for Republicans statewide. So what’s going on with elections in Washington state?

For a national perspective, Matt Margolis over at PJ Media pointed out “There are many theories about why the elections played out as they have. Many believe it was a lack of quality candidates, or the issue of abortion, or even Donald Trump.” Another possible reason might include low conservative turnout.

In Washington state, our results are not due to the lack of quality candidates. We had the strongest slate of Republican candidates up and down the ticket that I’ve seen in a long time. The Legislative Republican Caucus did a great job of recruiting strong candidates who fit their districts, and the candidates hit the campaign trail hard. And the Democrat candidates in this election are largely radical, progressive candidates who have voted to raise taxes, defund the police, and release criminals into our communities.

While Donald Trump did endorse a few Washington State candidates, he didn’t visit the state during the election cycle, and focused on other states where we had better opportunities nationally. I don’t believe he had much impact here.

Some political analysts are blaming low voter turnout. I reviewed the turnout numbers on the Secretary of State website on Sunday, four days after the election. It’s true voter turnout state wide is about 10% lower than the turnout four days after the election in the 2018 midterm.

However, there have been problems with the state’s signature verification database, so it’s possible we may see turnout improve as counties continue to process ballots this week. Since this turnout reduction appears to be impacting ALL counties, and not just conservative ones, I don’t think that the lower turnout specifically is to blame for Republican losses.

Before I tackle the issue of abortion, let’s consider Tucker Carlson’s opinion from Nov. 9. His first point was that the election process matters. In Washington, our laws governing elections include a number of problems that make it easy to manipulate outcomes and which reduce transparency.

Motor-voter laws, same-day voter registration, mandatory vote-by-mail, ballot harvesting and laws that make it difficult to keep voter databases up to date are all legal. These corrupt processes are most likely being used to manipulate elections. That doesn’t even consider possible problems with the tabulation equipment. Maybe that’s not even needed given the other easy AND legal ways to influence election results.

What’s most troubling about Washington’s election processes is that we will need a Legislature willing to fix these laws. But with Democrats in control of our Legislature, that’s not going to happen. How do conservative and independent Washington voters dig out of this hole? How do we activate enough voters to overcome the legal manipulation of elections? That’s going to continue to be a major challenge.

The other problem Tucker mentioned, which is even more insidious than our legal challenges, is the problem of who controls the media.

Another factor that makes a big difference to the outcome is “…access to channels of communication…you can say whatever you want, but if no one hears you, you’re not really speaking and that’s the case for Republicans so often…”

He continues, “The rest of the American media amounts to a gigantic filter designed to distort what Republicans are saying. It’s a campaign apparatus and only the Democrats have it… It’s about winning elections and Democrats can win because they have that. If Republicans want to win elections, too, they might spend some money to fix that, to achieve parity.”

In Washington, we saw the impact of media control in the Tiffany Smiley race regarding the issue of abortion. Abortion is already protected in Washington state law and the Supreme Court decision had no bearing on the rights of Washington State women to have abortions. As a Senator, Smiley would have had very little impact on that issue. However, the media and Murray ginned up abortion hysteria against a great candidate, and used this false narrative to motivate the progressive base.

Washington state’s Republicans cannot fix problems that they don’t acknowledge. There’s plenty of Republicans who claim that we don’t have an election integrity problem in our state. They take the easy route of blaming the voters or the candidates. Rather than continuing to live in denial, it’s time to face the real problems of corrupt voting processes and media manipulation of our message and come up with fresh ideas and a new game plan.

Nancy Churchill is the state committeewoman for the Ferry County Republican Party. She may be reached at DangerousRhetoric@pm.me. The opinions expressed in Dangerous Rhetoric are her own.

What was the biggest reason why conservatives didn't fare better in Washington's election?*
295 votes

Also read:

Receive comment notifications
Notify of
guest

10 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ron
Ron
14 days ago

LOL at voter manipulation. If you can’t think for yourself, that’s your problem.

Anna Miller
Anna Miller
13 days ago

Very well stated. I am in agreement with the entire content of this letter. Thank you to the author for being crystal clear about complex issues.

Wolfie
Wolfie
9 days ago
Reply to  Anna Miller

I think Nancy touched on some truisms. Conservatives don’t have the bull horn, so to speak. The media touts the candidates they tout and this is what is heard. We absolutely need in person voting brought back as at the very least an option. There is something energetic about voting in person. I guess we will see what shakes out on November 29th.

Bill
Bill
11 days ago

If we want more conservative turnout we need actual conservative candidates…the MAGA crybaby crowd has drifted so far out of line with conservative priorities may as well be a separate political party at this point.

Also…Tucker? That man is a terrible source for opinions, good for a laugh sometimes but he will say just about anything to keep eyeballs on screen.

Jennifer Jones
Jennifer Jones
4 days ago
Reply to  Bill

You mentioned “conservative priorities.” What do you consider the conservative priorities? Sincere question.

Amanda Blake
Amanda Blake
11 days ago

I don’t find much to agree with here. The problem is Donald Trump, Joe Kent and the other MEGA groupies.

Mark
Mark
10 days ago

I agree with three of the four commenters below. If we continue to blame Democrats (and their fraudulent corruption of the election process) for the fact we as Conservatives (Republicans) are not appealing to a broad enough segment of the population for our candidates to be elected, we are going to continue to lose. This is like a sports team blaming the lack of fans for why they continue to lose versus acknowledging they are not fielding a winning team with a strong game plan, and execution of same, for winning games and exciting their fans to support them. This doesn’t mean more fiery rhetoric about ‘owning the Libs’ and ‘making them pay’ when were back in power. It is about deep and resonant plans for how we will solve problems and improve peoples lives. I’m not necessarily in love with all policies of Florida Governor Ron Desantis i.e. bussing immigrants to New York certainly sends a message but doesn’t help our argument that we are the conservative party with higher moral (Christian) standards, but he does effectively legislate to solve problems for people in his state i.e. he doesn’t deny Climate Change (which is clearly in evidence in Florida) but focusses on what can be done here and now to help mitigate the worst of the impact for as many Floridians as possible. His win, in a landslide, is a testament to how Floridians across the political spectrum are willing to support a candidate who will address their concerns instead of just crying about ‘the unfairness of it all’. Remember, when you point the finger ‘at the other guy’, you still have three fingers pointing back at yourself. We are better than this!

Kimberlee Elbon
Kimberlee Elbon
5 days ago

I was at the Elections office in Clark County and a line of 30-40 People were there all day long. This line were ALL UN~REGISTERED !!!!!!!
I think We should do an audit on the un~registered votes that day and see if they voted Republican or democratic !!! I also want to say keep and eye out for action from this Lone Patriot at the Vancouver City Council meetings; as I have a lawsuit coming ~ I want to wake The Citizens up to what is happening ~ a one world order starting with local governments and depopulation !!!!!!! This PLANdemic is inhumane to say the least. God Family and Country is what I Fight The Good Fight for ~ God’s People AMEN we4the4people@aol.com

Kimberlee Elbon
Kimberlee Elbon
5 days ago

I also want to add this ~ It seems to Me that most descent People are Godly. It seems democrats can not turn away from their dem roots. Descent Citizens do not intend to do wrong; yet those that do not know God or do not Love Him are following evil. They do not have God and they will do evil, such as voter fraud or riots or propaganda, Nothing new under the sun. This IS Good over evil ~ and Good Wins AMEN
I continue The Good Fight AMEN

Anna Miller
Anna Miller
1 day ago

It’s too bad that CCT didn’t add a choice “These corrupt processes are most likely being used to manipulate elections. I think your survey would have a different outcome. My choice of those that were presented was “none of the above”.


10
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x