
Mark Harmsworth believes the Washington legislature should consider a similar bill to Illinois Senate Bill 1563
Mark Harmsworth
Washington Policy Center
A bill (Senate Bill 1563) that has passed the Illinois legislature that will treat squatters as trespassers is waiting for Governor J.B. Pritzker’s signature to become law. Squatters in Illinois, as in Washington, over the years have used loopholes in the law to occupy or extend residency in a house by claiming tenancy to avoid being charged with criminal trespass. This makes an eviction a lot more difficult.

Washington State’s squatter rights laws, rooted in adverse possession statutes, are increasingly problematic for property owners and communities. These laws, intended to resolve historical land disputes, allow individuals to claim ownership of property they occupy without permission, provided they meet certain criteria, such as continuous use for seven years and paying taxes. However, in practice, these laws create significant challenges that undermine property rights and public safety.
Squatter rights laws erode the fundamental principle of private property ownership. Homeowners and property owners face prolonged legal battles to evict squatters, often incurring substantial costs. In Washington, the process can take months, as courts require property owners to navigate complex eviction procedures, even when squatters have no legal claim, including substantial delays in Seattle last year. This delays justice and burdens owners, particularly small property owners who rely on rental income.
These laws strain law enforcement and local governments. Squatters often exploit legal ambiguities, forcing police to treat disputes as civil matters rather than criminal trespassing. This leaves neighborhoods vulnerable to blight, as unoccupied properties attract vandalism, drug activity, and other crimes. Data from Seattle shows a rise in complaints about squatter-occupied properties, with some areas reporting increased petty crime and decreased property values.
Squatter rights laws also discourage property investment. Developers and homeowners hesitate to purchase or maintain properties, fearing legal entanglements with squatters. This exacerbates Washington’s housing shortage, driving up costs in an already strained market.
Reforming squatter rights laws is critical. Washington should streamline eviction processes, clarify trespassing laws, and prioritize property owners’ rights. Without reform, these outdated statutes will continue to harm communities, deter investment, and undermine the rule of law. Protecting property rights is essential for a thriving, safe Washington.
The Washington legislature should consider a similar bill to Illinois Senate Bill 1563. It would go a long way to help restore property owner confidence and increase available rental properties in Washington.
Mark Harmsworth is the director of the Small Business Center at the Washington Policy Center.
Also read:
- Washington governor talks potential return of SuperSonics with NBA commissionerGov. Bob Ferguson spoke with NBA Commissioner Adam Silver about the possibility of bringing the Seattle SuperSonics back as the league weighs future expansion decisions.
- Opinion: The income tax proposal has arrivedRyan Frost of the Washington Policy Center argues that a proposed Washington income tax creates a new revenue stream rather than delivering tax reform or relief.
- Is it time to lower the legal limit for blood alcohol content to 0.05 in the state of Washington?Mothers Against Drunk Driving and families affected by impaired driving are urging Washington lawmakers to lower the legal BAC limit to 0.05, citing prevention data and personal testimony from Clark County residents.
- Expert in homebuilding has several tips on how to make housing affordableVeteran homebuilder Tracy Doriot shares his perspective on why regulations, taxes, labor shortages, and permitting delays are driving housing costs higher in Clark County and across Washington.
- POLL: If a sub-district is created, what area should it include?Clark County residents are asked where a potential C-TRAN sub-district should be drawn if voters are asked to fund light rail operations and maintenance costs.







