Elizabeth New (Hovde) believes passage of I-2124 should motivate lawmakers to find real solutions for our graying population that aren’t built on the backs of workers, including low-income ones
Elizabeth New (Hovde)
Washington Policy Center
I was invited to write two opinion pieces about Initiative 2124 for The Seattle Times and The Spokesman-Review. Both were published this past weekend to offer readers different perspectives on a Nov. 5 ballot measure that would make a payroll tax and participation in the WA Cares program optional.
These guest columns highlight different things about the trouble with WA Cares and the value of I-2124, so if you are interested in the initiative and how it could impact workers, read them both here and here.
What is highlighted in each opinion piece is that WA Cares is harming low-income workers, that many workers are not going to see a monetary benefit even after years of paying into the fund — and even sometimes if they need long-term care — and that lawmakers who support WA Cares admit the program is broken. Still, they haven’t been able to fix the 2019 legislation that created WA Cares. That’s because WA Cares is misguided from start to finish.
Taxpayers should support safety nets for people in need. Luckily, they already do support a safety net for people in financial need of long-term care: Medicaid. But the safety net is being misused, causing headaches for state budget writers and bringing a high cost to taxpayers.
Passage of I-2124 should motivate lawmakers to find real solutions for our graying population that aren’t built on the backs of workers, including low-income ones. Priority-based budgeting, Medicaid reform, increased choice and awareness about long-term care are needed, not WA Cares.
Read Elizabeth New (Hovde) Citizen’s Guide to I-2124 here.
Elizabeth New (Hovde) is a policy analyst and director of the Centers for Health Care and Worker Rights at the Washington Policy Center. She is a Clark County resident.
Also read:
- POLL: With updated estimates reaching as high as $17.7 billion, what should happen to the I-5 Bridge replacement project?
A new poll asks readers how the I-5 Bridge replacement project should proceed amid higher cost estimates and questions about transparency within the Interstate Bridge Replacement Program. - Letter: ‘Walz’s tough talk is a blatant attempt to deflect his complicity in the massive fraud in his state’
Camas resident Anna Miller argues that a governor has no legal authority to deploy the National Guard to interfere with federal law enforcement and criticizes Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz’s public statements. - Opinion: Not a Good choice
Lars Larson argues that personal choices led to a deadly confrontation with law enforcement during an ICE operation in Minneapolis. - Opinion: ‘The IBR team has been lying to us and thanks to a veteran Oregon journalist, we have the smoking gun’
Ken Vance argues newly obtained documents show Interstate Bridge Replacement staff withheld updated cost estimates from lawmakers and the public. - Opinion: State CO2 report shows 86% of Washington’s claimed climate benefits are probably fake
Todd Myers argues a state climate report significantly overstates emissions reductions and raises concerns about data accuracy and accountability in Washington’s climate spending.
