Ridgefield resident Heidi Pozzo asks how the hiring of a new Ridgefield School District superintendent will impact the district’s capital plans
Heidi Pozzo
for Clark County Today
New leaders always have a perspective of what is needed to accomplish the goals they were brought in to achieve. And capital plans are certainly part of what a new leader would be thinking about when taking the helm.
Will they agree with the projects that are set forth in the bond measures on the April 2024 ballot?
That past provides insight into how impactful changes in the strategy for building schools can be. In 2012, Ridgefield School District voters approved a bond measure in what is now known as the first phase in the District’s Capital Facility Plan. But the original plan wasn’t what it is today.
The plan in 2012 called for building a new high school on the 50-acre parcel where the sports complex and View Ridge/Sunset Ridge sit, and converting the existing high school into a middle school. Looking at that plan today, it made a heck of a lot of sense with providing more flexibility for enrollment growth, while requiring lower capital than current plans.
Some combination of community input and a new superintendent that arrived in 2014 changed those plans.
In 2017, that plan morphed into what you see today. The addition of the new 5-8 school, the use of 30 acres of the 50-acre parcel for a sports complex, and the conversion of the old View Ridge to an administrative and civic center. All of which were not part of the 2012 plan. The new plan includes building two more elementary schools and another 5-8 school.
What will the next evolution hold? Another significant impact to the capital facility plans?
Interviews are ongoing right now for a new superintendent. The person ultimately selected will have a perspective on what is needed and the best way to accomplish that. Will they want what is planned at the high school? Or will they think something different is needed? Will they think the current asks for new schools make sense based on enrollment growth? Or do they have a different vision? Will precious taxpayer dollars be spent well or wasted?
There’s a chance to ask the candidates in upcoming community sessions. One way or another, the community should understand how the superintendent candidates view the needs before committing scarce taxpayer funds.
Heidi Pozzo has been a Ridgefield resident for 16 years. She is a concerned citizen who would like students to get a good education and thinks we can do it in a more cost-effective way.
Also read:
- POLL: Should councilors serving on boards be required to vote the way the full council decides?
A new poll asks whether Clark County councilors serving on boards should be required to vote in line with the full council’s position or retain independent judgment. - Opinion: Olympia wants a 4-day work week. It won’t work out as the politicians think it will
Mark Harmsworth argues that House Bill 2611’s proposed 32-hour workweek would raise costs, strain small businesses, and undermine Washington’s economic competitiveness. - Opinion: The many reminders not to speed
Doug Dahl examines the many technological and policy-based reminders aimed at reducing speeding and explains why most drivers still choose not to use them voluntarily. - Opinion: Free care for people who don’t live here? It’s being encouraged — HB 2250 can help
Elizabeth New (Hovde) argues that Washington’s current charity care rules encourage out-of-state use of non-emergency hospital services and supports HB 2250 to restore residency-based limits. - Opinion: Update on legislation to restore fairness and local control to transit governing boards and a bill to create accountability for the I-5 Bridge project
Rep. John Ley outlines the status of several bills addressing transit governance, accountability for the Interstate 5 Bridge Replacement Project, criminal sentencing standards, and ongoing state responsibilities in his latest legislative update.
