Elizabeth Hovde explains that HB 2295 and SB 6101 would give the state more solutions for freeing up needed acute-care beds
Elizabeth Hovde
Washington Policy Center
Getting hospital services at home? A lot of us would like that and have homes conducive to such a setup. Being in your familiar surroundings is working for the patients who have taken part in the optional programs, physicians testify in legislative committees that they like the access solution, and hospitals trying such a program have seen good health outcomes. Win-win-win.
This idea was made possible with a federal waiver in COVID-19 times, and it will expire soon. States need to decide whether to continue the hospital programs. That is what legislation moving in the House and Senate would accomplish.
HB 2295 and SB 6101 would give the state more solutions for freeing up needed acute-care beds. We need those.
Such a program respects patient decisions, offers flexibility in our health care system and is being done in a way that keeps health care quality high. Hospitals report good outcomes, including low readmission and escalation rates, better discharge times and high patient satisfaction.
I’m hopeful the bill makes it through the House and Senate largely unscathed, avoiding additional micromanagement of services hospitals are supplying in homes. Hospital-at-home programs are seeing success in our state and others. If the programs aren’t broken, let’s not make it harder for hospitals and patients to see and experience continued success.
Watch the House Health Care and Wellness Committee hearing where the proposal was considered, and where I offered testimony, on Wednesday.
Elizabeth Hovde is a policy analyst and the director of the Centers for Health Care and Worker Rights at the Washington Policy Center. She is a Clark County resident.
Also read:
- Opinion: Half the road, full stop – Understanding pedestrian right-of-way
Doug Dahl explains how Washington’s law requires drivers to stop when a pedestrian is within one lane of their half of the road, not just when directly in front. - Opinion: The state’s RFK-proofing bill comes with a cost
Mandates like HB 2242 can lead to higher premiums as insurance companies absorb costs for new preventive services, affecting affordability statewide. - Opinion: What is the cost of a bridge?
John Ley argues the I-5 Bridge replacement’s soaring cost stems from costly extras like light rail, noting other states deliver larger, toll-free bridges for much less. - POLL: Do you agree with giving a state commission the power to remove an elected sheriff?
A new poll asks if a state commission—not voters—should have the power to remove an elected sheriff, following concerns raised by Clark County Sheriff John Horch. - Opinion: Defending Democracy by denying it?
Washington voters are blocked from weighing in on new income taxes as state lawmakers and officials bypass public input, drawing criticism from Northwest voices.
