Elizabeth Hovde explains that HB 2295 and SB 6101 would give the state more solutions for freeing up needed acute-care beds
Elizabeth Hovde
Washington Policy Center
Getting hospital services at home? A lot of us would like that and have homes conducive to such a setup. Being in your familiar surroundings is working for the patients who have taken part in the optional programs, physicians testify in legislative committees that they like the access solution, and hospitals trying such a program have seen good health outcomes. Win-win-win.
This idea was made possible with a federal waiver in COVID-19 times, and it will expire soon. States need to decide whether to continue the hospital programs. That is what legislation moving in the House and Senate would accomplish.
HB 2295 and SB 6101 would give the state more solutions for freeing up needed acute-care beds. We need those.
Such a program respects patient decisions, offers flexibility in our health care system and is being done in a way that keeps health care quality high. Hospitals report good outcomes, including low readmission and escalation rates, better discharge times and high patient satisfaction.
I’m hopeful the bill makes it through the House and Senate largely unscathed, avoiding additional micromanagement of services hospitals are supplying in homes. Hospital-at-home programs are seeing success in our state and others. If the programs aren’t broken, let’s not make it harder for hospitals and patients to see and experience continued success.
Watch the House Health Care and Wellness Committee hearing where the proposal was considered, and where I offered testimony, on Wednesday.
Elizabeth Hovde is a policy analyst and the director of the Centers for Health Care and Worker Rights at the Washington Policy Center. She is a Clark County resident.
Also read:
- Letter: ‘Are we being punked?’
Anna Miller questions the Clark County Council’s authority to pass a resolution on ICE and urges members to focus on core county responsibilities. - Letter: ‘People who have entered illegally must face the consequences of their actions’
Vancouver resident Debra Kalz argues the County Council should not pass immigration-related resolutions and says laws must be followed or changed through proper channels. - Opinion: IBR’s systematic disinformation campaign, its demise
Neighbors for a Better Crossing challenges IBR’s seismic claims and promotes a reuse-and-tunnel alternative they say would save billions at the I-5 crossing. - Letter: ‘Our forefathers warned us to assemble when government rules over We The People’
La Center resident Kimberlee Goheen Elbon criticizes the County Council’s handling of immigration-related meetings and urges residents to assemble and speak out. - Opinion: ‘County Council meetings have become an embarrassment to our community’
Ken Vance criticizes recent Clark County Council meeting conduct and calls for increased security and stronger leadership from Chair Sue Marshall.
