Elizabeth New shares legal advice from Davis Wright Tremaine, a business law firm
Elizabeth New
Washington Policy Center
I appreciated this information about Washington state’s new domestic workers’ law from Davis Wright Tremaine (DWT), a business law firm. It details what households should know and need to do when House Bill 2355 is implemented in 2027. “Beginning July 1, 2027, any environment where a nanny, caregiver, housekeeper, cook, gardener, or household manager works is treated as a regulated workplace with enforceable standards,” writes DWT.
Supporters say the law is meant to protect domestic workers in our state from wage theft, a lack of clarity about expectations or bad employers, which is totally reasonable. What isn’t reasonable is how the law is written. It makes voluntary exchanges for household work between independent contractors and those who hire them formal arrangements with enforceable standards. As few as four hours of monthly work means the person doing the hiring needs to provide the worker with a written contract, minimum wage and overtime pay when applicable. The hiring entity also needs to keep payroll records, track sick leave that’s attached to domestic workers and provide a termination notice.
Tax obligations and a new paper trail could complicate things for both parties, and penalties for employers who don’t comply are real. Exemptions for “casual workers” are all too vague and will be decided by state agencies and courts as we go along — that is if what we think of as “casual workers” are still hired. A lot of “hiring entities” will now be turning to agencies for house or yard work, child or elder care. Sigh. Voluntary work arrangements that have provided a lot of Washingtonians with flexibility that benefits both workers and those paying them will be deterred.
Check out, “Five things every Washington household and domestic staffing business must know: Your home may now be a workplace.” It concludes this way: “Washington’s new Domestic Workers Bill of Rights is a wake‑up call for every employer — business or household — who relies on in‑home labor. … The home may be private — but starting in 2027, your compliance obligations definitely aren’t.”
Elizabeth New is the director of the Centers for Health Care and Worker Rights at the Washington Policy Center. She is a Clark County resident.
Also read:
- Opinion: Washington passed an income tax to fund education, then the same majority cut education — and left $700+ million on the table
State officials passed a new income tax to fund education, then approved over $1 billion in cuts—while forgoing $700 million in annual federal scholarships students could have received. - Letter: In defense of Joe Kent, a war hero
Ozzie Gonzalez shares a firsthand account of his time working for Joe Kent, emphasizing Kent’s military background and principled stance on foreign policy controversies. - Opinion: ‘Washington’s majority party is panicking’
Nancy Churchill argues that controversial state policies, including new taxes, law enforcement changes, and agency power grabs, are generating a wave of backlash in communities across Washington. - Letter: ‘Now we have Engineer Bob telling us the I-5 Bridge needs replacing because it is built on shifting sand with wooden structures’
Amboy resident Thomas Schenk critiques Democrat leadership, tax policies, and the addition of light rail to the I-5 Bridge, while urging Republican voters to participate more in midterm elections. - Opinion: ‘This is not the best and most efficient use of the taxpayers’ funds’
Ken Vance critiques the announced $14.4 billion I-5 Bridge replacement, questioning funding gaps, the insistence on light rail, unaddressed congestion, and transparency from state officials.
