Elizabeth Hovde of the Washington Policy Center believes that ‘instead of booster bucks, the governor needs to end his vaccine mandate altogether’
Washington Policy Center
Washingtonians aren’t happy about Gov. Jay Inslee’s plan to hand out taxpayer dollars to state workers who get COVID-19 booster shots.
Why would they be? This costly booster incentive is clearly not about a public health benefit. Neither vaccines nor boosters stop the spread or contraction of COVID-19, and King County numbers have been showing for months that people with boosters are more likely to test positive for COVID-19 than those with just initial vaccination. Hospitalizations and death rates for boosted individuals and those who are just fully vaccinated are negligible. So much for science.
Only 27% of respondents approved of the booster bucks, a poll sponsored by The Seattle Times, KING 5, the University of Washington’s Center for an Informed Public and Washington State University’s Murrow College of Communication found. It should be noted that 22% of respondents misguidedly thought the state should require the booster without an incentive, and another 35% disapproved of a bonus or a requirement.
The Washington Federation of State Employees (WFSE) says the deal the governor made for incentives — instead of requiring boosters along with his vaccine mandate — will apply to roughly 35,000 state employees and that the $1,000-per-worker bribe will be well utilized. This is going to cost us.
The Executive Cabinet consists of 24 agencies, including the Department of Transportation, Washington State Patrol and the Department of Corrections — all of which have had heartburn because of the vaccine mandate. (See the full group of state agencies here. Every small-cabinet agency can be seen here.) Office of Financial Management (OFM) data show there were 2,135 state-worker separations due to the governor’s vaccine mandate.
An employee must prove he or she is up to date with all boosters recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in 2023 to receive the $1,000 booster incentive, OFM confirmed for me Tuesday.
Before a dime goes out, starting in July of 2023, the Legislature should try to shut this booster bribe down. Coercing people to get boosters that they may not want or be advised by their doctors to get isn’t good policy. Even Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel has said not everyone is likely to need an annual booster. And giving away taxpayer dollars to the tune of $1,000 per employee for a choice that isn’t about public health, and appears to many to be more of a loyalty test, is not responsible.
Instead of booster bucks, Inslee needs to end his vaccine mandate altogether, acknowledging that we know more now about the vaccines’ strengths and limitations, that COVID-19 severity has changed and that his mandate is not useful for state services and penalizes workers needlessly. I’ve been urging him to send rehire and apology letters.
That might be happening in New York City soon.
This week, the New York Supreme Court ordered New York City to rehire and pay back wages to government employees who were fired for refusing to get a COVID-19 vaccination. The opinion, authored by Judge Ralph J. Porzio, noted that vaccination against COVID-19 does not prevent transmission of the disease and if requiring the vaccine was about safety and public health, no one would be made exempt. Some were. “It is time for the City of New York to do what is right and what is just,” concluded Porzio. Read more in the National Review.
Elizabeth Hovde is a policy analyst and the director of the Centers for Health Care and Worker Rights at the Washington Policy Center. She is a Clark County resident.
- Medical expert warns mutating COVID-19 virus would be criminalIt was only days ago that a Project Veritas undercover video revealed Pfizer executive Jordon Trishton Walker saying that his company was exploring intentionally creating mutations of the COVID virus to “preemptively develop new vaccines.”
- WATCH: Pfizer exec on hidden camera: We’re exploring mutating COVID ourselvesTo ‘preemptively develop new vaccines’ will be ‘a cash cow for us,’ reveals latest Project Veritas undercover sting.
- Historic ruling: District Court judge blocks doctors’ censorship law in CaliforniaThe judge found that the ‘plaintiffs have established a likelihood of success on the grounds of their Fourteenth Amendment vagueness challenges.’
- Despite mountain of damning evidence, FDA pushes annual COVID boostersThe FDA is now recommending Americans take annual COVID booster vaccines much like the flu shots that are made available every year, but selling that plan to a skeptical public will be increasingly difficult as doubts about the booster shots grow.
- Top heart doc: COVID vaccines to blame for sudden deaths of young athletesPeter McCullough, M.D.: ‘The COVID-19 vaccines should have been pulled from the market … for excessive mortality.’
- CDC regularly called the shots on Facebook’s COVID censorship decisionsWND News Center, The Daily News Caller Foundation, Facebook, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine, social media, COVID censorship, Vancouver, Clark County
- Key scientist sounds alarm: Withdraw COVID shots ‘immediately’A key scientist in the United Kingdom, Dr. Richard Ennos, has written a column at Summit.News calling for the COVID-19 shots to be withdrawn “immediately.”
- Not just misinformation: In emails to White House, Facebook admits suppressing ‘often-true’ contentFacebook told an official at the Biden White House that the Big Tech company not only suppressed misinformation but took action against the “virality” of “often-true content” regarding the COVID-19 vaccines.