Opinion: Education spending has doubled in 10 years, and most of the money went to hiring administrators and non-teachers

Liv Finne of the Washington Policy Center questions why education spending has increased while student learning suffers.


Liv Finne of the Washington Policy Center suggests we ask why lawmakers put so much public money into creating nice jobs for adults while allowing student learning to suffer

Liv Finne
Washington Policy Center

Politicians in Washington state like to say the public schools need more money. They often make this subjective claim not because of any real financial need since Washington’s public schools have ample funding, but to justify increasing taxes on the hardworking people of the state.

Liv Finne, Washington Policy Center
Liv Finne, Washington Policy Center

Today public schools have slowing enrollment but increasing budgets. Schools receive over $20 billion a year, enough to provide over $19,000 per student, which is more than tuition at most private schools.

So a caring taxpayer may rightly wonder, “Where is all that money going?”

A new analysis from the Office of Fiscal Management (OFM) provides the answer. The data shows public school administrators are hiring more administrators and other non-teachers at twice the rate of hiring teachers for the classroom.

Currently, 80% of school operating budgets go to paying salaries and benefits for staff. That means that each new administrative and non-teacher position deprives students of classroom resources.

Let’s review. In 2011-12 the biennial state budget for public schools was $13.1 billion. In 2023-25, it is $30.6 billion. (See 2024 Citizen’s Guide to K-12 Funding, page 12 here.) Over the same period total annual per student funding, from all state, local and federal resources, grew from $10,000 to $19,100.

For comparison the current average private school tuition is $14,000 for elementary school and $16,000 for high school.

The doubling of education funding is the result of policy decisions. Starting in 2012 the legislature dramatically increased school spending in response to the McCleary court ruling. Then in 2018 state lawmakers increased the property tax burden so they could further boost education spending.

The bulk of the increased spending went to non-teaching staff. State data show that teaching staff increased by 25%, the number of school principals increased by 42%, other administrative staff increased by 54%, and non-teacher staff positions increased a whopping 66%.

The next time an elected official says we should pay higher taxes for schools, show him or her this graph from OFM. And while you’re at it, you might also ask why lawmakers put so much public money into creating nice jobs for adults while allowing student learning to suffer.

Liv Finne is the director of the Center for Education at the Washington Policy Center. 


Also read:

3 Comments

  1. Nike

    Oh, Liv! Say it ain’t so; the edjumkatun rats squandering our tax dollars on empire building instead of educating children? I’m just SO shocked AND surprised! Goodness, what will we hear next, that these rats have been doing facilities deferred maintenance and want to screw us for more money to repair their deteriorating buildings? I’ve just lost sooooo much faith in the edjummkatun establishment….. /s

    Reply
  2. Dave Roberts

    Good reporting on a the continual waste of money by School Districts. More đź’µ đź’µ for administration is criminal. One of the unanswered questions is what did the SD really do with the Fed$ handed out during Fog of COVID.

    Reply
  3. Mike

    If you don’t believe what is in this story, go look at the number of new “administrative” positions created since the pandemic. Look at how many districts now have “Executive Directors” or new “assistant” positions. Most of those were created to “reward” friends and cronies.

    How many local districts have told the press/public that they had to make “cuts” to deal with budgetary shortfalls, but have people in new “administrative” positions? Some of these positions are not even known to the school boards – they magically appear out of thin air.

    The next time that your district runs a levy to raise your taxes, go to a board meeting and put the School Board and Superintendent on the spot. Ask them about the number of positions they created since the previous levy and how these positions benefited your child’s education. They won’t have an answer for you.

    BGSD is preparing to run a replacement levy in February 2025 – if it fails, it means that they will be short somewhere in the neighborhood of $31 million dollars. Maybe the cuts should come from the top administrators and leave those at the schools alone?

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *