
Mark Harmsworth of the Washington Policy Center believes House Bill 1628 will not solve housing affordability in either the ownership, rental or commercial real estate markets
Mark Harmsworth
Washington Policy Center
House Bill 1628 (HB 1628), currently stuck in committee in the House of Representatives, is being thrown around as another way for the legislature to increase taxes this year. Despite significant push back from Washington residents, relators and other industry groups, HB 1628 would raise taxes on the sale on homes.

House Bill 1628 (HB 1628) creates a new property tax category of 4% on property valued at over $5 million.
Proponents of HB 1628 argue that a property owner that sells property that is valued at over $5 million can afford to pay the additional tax rate. The majority of properties, however, that are sold and valued over $5 million, are multi-unit housing, apartments, duplexes, retail and commercial properties which provide homes, products and services for every Washington resident.
Simple demand and supply economics show that by redistributing taxes (and in the case of House Bill 1628, increasing taxes) will not decrease prices.
The legislature needs to pass legislation that promotes the availability of new housing rather than subsidizing the housing that is already built. Simple changes to the Growth Management Act (GMA), by modifying the arbitrary growth boundaries and population density goals set by the Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) will increase available land and the ability for more affordable housing to be built.
House Bill 1628 will not solve housing affordability in either the ownership, rental or commercial real estate markets. It will, in the long term, only continue to increase the cost of housing, products and services.
For WPC’s recommendations on how to increase housing affordability and availability, without increasing fees and taxes, click here.
Mark Harmsworth is the director of the Small Business Center at the Washington Policy Center.
Also read:
- Opinion: Do we still need TriMet?John A. Charles Jr. of the Cascade Policy Institute argues that TriMet should halt expansion plans and prepare for major service reductions in response to falling ridership and rising costs.
- Opinion: Spokane’s voter approved anti-camping initiative is overturned by the Washington Supreme CourtMark Harmsworth of the Washington Policy Center says overturning Spokane’s voter-approved anti-camping initiative undermines public safety and the will of the people.
- Letter: ‘Democrats never met an increase in fees, taxes or charges they wouldn’t vote for’Amboy resident Thomas Schenk argues that unchecked one-party Democrat rule in Washington state has led to steep increases in taxes and erosion of individual rights — with nonvoters to blame.
- Letter: ‘They fear our voices — but we have not yet begun to fight’In a strongly worded letter, Vancouver resident Justin Forsman accuses local political figures and media of suppressing dissent and free speech during his campaign.
- Letter: Vancouver must end unequal enforcement of its lawsVancouver resident Peter Bracchi calls on the city to end the unequal enforcement of its laws, urging a return to fairness and accountability.