Clark County resident Dick Rylander addresses candidates’ unwillingness to reveal positions with voters

Dick Rylander 
for Clark County Today

I have been a resident of Clark County for a total of 32-plus years. I’ve been a candidate for several offices so I understand the challenges candidates face. They want to appeal to everyone and irritate as few as possible.

In early September I reached out to residents of Clark County and asked what they (as a voter) would like to know about positions of candidates they could vote for. From that feedback I consolidated the suggestions and set up a simple Yes/No position format with room for some notes. Those questions can be seen below:

I sent an email to each of the candidates for Washington House and Senate seats in the 17th; 18th; 20th and 49th Legislative District’s on Sept. 23 using the contact email on their website(s). I asked them to respond no later than Oct. 4 explaining that responses would be shared with the public.

I received an email from one candidate asking for some clarifications.

As of Oct. 5 I received exactly ZERO (0) responses.

Why no responses? Given the level of vitriol in the political world today the candidates may be concerned about how their comments could be turned into negative attack ads. They may find some issues to be multifaceted and not easy to address simply. They might not want to be pigeon holed because of an answer. They may be concerned that the downside is greater than the upside if they respond.

A few years ago I spent several hours over coffee talking with a candidate for one of the House seats in Southwest Washington. I asked them why they avoided certain topics or were vague on others. This candidate said the consultants suggested that being vague reduced negatives and increased the chance of getting elected.

Maybe it’s best if people don’t have a lot of clarity about a candidate? I’m sure there are other reasons why none of them chose to respond.

In the end you can read what you can find AND you can contact each candidate and ask one of these questions or your own. When you learn something please share with others so we can all be better informed.

---

Also read:

• 
  WA Senate Republicans unable to stop income tax bill now headed to governor’s desk 
  Washington lawmakers narrowly approved a new income tax on households earning over $1 million, setting the stage for court battles and a statewide initiative campaign.
• 
  17th District lawmakers Kevin Waters and David Stuebe decry passage of state income tax bill after marathon floor debate
  Reps. Kevin Waters and David Stuebe condemn Senate Bill 6346, warning the new state income tax sends more money into the general fund without real reform, risks expanding to every family, and ignores Washington’s affordability crisis.
• 
  Opinion: Washington’s fight for liberty
  Conservative columnist Nancy Churchill argues that despite the passage of a new 9.9% state income tax, signs of shifting political momentum in Washington state give reason for hope and continued action.
• 
  18th District Reps. Stephanie McClintock and John Ley denounce passage of state income tax
  Following a marathon 24-hour House floor debate, 18th District Reps. Stephanie McClintock and John Ley denounce Senate Bill 6346, a new 9.9% state income tax on household income above $1 million, warning it could expand broadly, harm Washington’s economy, and face serious constitutional challenges.
• 
  Opinion: Brandi Kruse and I are feeling discouraged but we’re planning to continue advocating for political change. Will you?
  Clark County Today Editor Ken Vance reflects on a discouraging week in Washington state politics, echoing Brandi Kruse’s frustrations over Democrats’ state income tax victory and local decisions on transit and ICE while urging conservatives not to give up on advocating for political change.