Clark County resident Dick Rylander addresses candidates’ unwillingness to reveal positions with voters

Dick Rylander 
for Clark County Today

I have been a resident of Clark County for a total of 32-plus years. I’ve been a candidate for several offices so I understand the challenges candidates face. They want to appeal to everyone and irritate as few as possible.

In early September I reached out to residents of Clark County and asked what they (as a voter) would like to know about positions of candidates they could vote for. From that feedback I consolidated the suggestions and set up a simple Yes/No position format with room for some notes. Those questions can be seen below:

I sent an email to each of the candidates for Washington House and Senate seats in the 17th; 18th; 20th and 49th Legislative District’s on Sept. 23 using the contact email on their website(s). I asked them to respond no later than Oct. 4 explaining that responses would be shared with the public.

I received an email from one candidate asking for some clarifications.

As of Oct. 5 I received exactly ZERO (0) responses.

Why no responses? Given the level of vitriol in the political world today the candidates may be concerned about how their comments could be turned into negative attack ads. They may find some issues to be multifaceted and not easy to address simply. They might not want to be pigeon holed because of an answer. They may be concerned that the downside is greater than the upside if they respond.

A few years ago I spent several hours over coffee talking with a candidate for one of the House seats in Southwest Washington. I asked them why they avoided certain topics or were vague on others. This candidate said the consultants suggested that being vague reduced negatives and increased the chance of getting elected.

Maybe it’s best if people don’t have a lot of clarity about a candidate? I’m sure there are other reasons why none of them chose to respond.

In the end you can read what you can find AND you can contact each candidate and ask one of these questions or your own. When you learn something please share with others so we can all be better informed.

---

Also read:

• 
  White House govt. Funding request for 2027 cuts $73 billion
  President Trump’s budget seeks to boost defense funding while cutting $73 billion from agencies like the EPA, NASA, and Agriculture, prompting sharp criticism from Democratic leaders.
• 
  Heywood asks WA Supreme Court to allow referendum effort on income tax
  Brian Heywood is petitioning the state Supreme Court after the Secretary of State rejected a referendum to repeal Washington’s new 9.9% tax on income over $1 million.
• 
  VIDEO: Families at center of WA transgender sports debate face-to-face with OSPI
  Two Washington high school students and their parents met with Superintendent Chris Reykdal to discuss concerns about sports policies after one student faced an investigation for harassment.
• 
  As Washington lawmakers punt on school cellphone ban, some want more action
  At Robert Eagle Staff Middle School, all-day phone removal led to fewer conflicts and more student engagement, but some parents and lawmakers argue a ban should not be imposed statewide.
• 
  POLL: Do you agree with giving a state commission the power to remove an elected sheriff?
  A new poll asks if a state commission—not voters—should have the power to remove an elected sheriff, following concerns raised by Clark County Sheriff John Horch.