Taking effect for the first time this year, Washington is now the only state in the country to impose a standalone income tax on capital gains

Jason Mercier
Mountain States Policy Center

With property tax assessments increasing rapidly in Wyoming, some have begun to discuss whether there should be changes to the Cowboy State’s tax structure. It is important to first remember that assessed property values do not necessarily drive the actual property tax bill. Instead, that tax obligation is primarily set through the budget process by the amount to be spent (whether approved by government officials or voters through levies).

Concerning Wyoming’s current tax structure, as one of just a handful of states without a personal income tax, extreme caution should be taken to avoid losing this economic competitive advantage. This is especially true with any discussion of imposing a highly volatile and unpredictable income tax on capital gains.

Taking effect for the first time this year, Washington is now the only state in the country to impose a standalone income tax on capital gains (other income tax states tax it as ordinary income as part of their income tax codes). The policy choice has resulted in national tax rankings removing Washington’s prior standing of not having a personal income tax.

The federal Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has made it very clear that a capital gains tax is an income tax. Our friends at the Washington Policy Center posted this letter from the IRS clearly explaining this fact.

IRS: “This is in response to your inquiry regarding the tax treatment of capital gains. You ask whether tax on capital gains is considered an excise tax or an income tax? It is an income tax. More specifically, capital gains are treated as income under the tax code and taxed as such.”

Imposing taxes on capital gains income is not a recipe for predictable state revenue.

As explained by the California Legislative Analyst’s Office (LAO):

“California’s tax revenues have numerous volatile elements, but among the more significant sources of revenue volatility are the state’s tax levies on net capital gains through the personal income tax.”

The CA LAO further cautions:

“Capital gains depend heavily on movements in financial markets. As such, capital gains revenue is extremely volatile and difficult to predict. In any given year, there is significant risk that capital gains revenue could fall below budgetary expectations.”

If the goal of structural state tax reform is to improve budget stability and avoid boom-and-bust tax collections, an income tax on capital gains is the worst possible choice Wyoming policymakers can make.

Jason Mercier is the vice president and director of research at the Mountain States Policy Center.

---

Also read:

• 
  Opinion: ‘I am absolutely disgusted by lawmakers and educators who have been successful in reducing parental rights’
  Clark County Today Editor Ken Vance voices concern over recent changes to parental rights legislation in Washington state and urges support for education alternatives.
• 
  Letter: ‘Objectivity to scientific decision-making should be present in government officials’
  Vancouver resident Michael Glynn questions Clark County’s scientific objectivity in development decisions near a bald eagle nest.
• 
  Opinion: Governor Ferguson signs the largest tax increase in Washington’s history into law
  Mark Harmsworth critiques Washington’s new budget, calling it the largest tax increase in state history and warning that its burdens on businesses and consumers outweigh the benefits.
• 
  Opinion: Work? Strike? Whatever; Employers now required to pay union members not to work
  A new Washington law allows striking workers to collect unemployment benefits, a move Elizabeth New argues will unfairly burden employers and encourage more frequent and prolonged strikes.
• 
  Opinion: Parent notification of medical services, mental health issues involving students is removed
  A new Washington state law removes parental notification requirements for student medical and mental health issues, reversing protections established by a 2023 voter-approved initiative.