Donald Kimball of the Washington Policy Center believes fostering a renewed commitment to the idea that the strength of change lies fundamentally in the hands of local communities
Donald Kimball
Washington Policy Center
“People almost invariably arrive at their beliefs not on the basis of proof but on the basis of what they find attractive.” French thinker Blaise Pascal voiced this bit of wisdom some 300 years ago, but modernity has vindicated his insight in a number of ways. One fascinating example is a recent national poll conducted by the State Policy Network (SPN). In it, respondents express conflicting views about the importance and effectiveness of local versus national government. The findings suggest that while Americans fundamentally distrust the federal government compared to local authorities, they will overwhelmingly vote to strengthen federal agencies to solve local issues.
The first category of questions shows the breakdown of trust: Only 49% indicate any sense of trust in the federal government, with higher totals of 64% in state government and 68% in city and local government. This is a reasonable skew, as the smaller and closer governments are to the public the more generally accountable they become.
The next set of questions continues this line of reasoning, with respondents consistently and overwhelmingly affirming the importance and effectiveness of local government, contrasted with the ineffectiveness and bloated nature of the federal government.
With all of these responses in line, the results of the final question I’m highlighting seems contradictory. Even after affirming a higher level of trust, effectiveness, and importance of more local governments, we see a majority of respondents say that, between the two choices, a strong federal government is the best way to solve our nation’s problems, rather than a strong local government.
While there are certainly points to be made about the unique role the federal government plays in our nation, it is interesting to note how little faith people have in the institution they believe must be strengthened to fix problems (with a majority specifically admitting the scope of the federal government is already too big). National politics often takes the spotlight in the media, but the other survey responses suggest people acknowledge that impactful change is more achievable at the local and state levels.
While the enormity of problems might tempt us to shift responsibility to a distant, large government, many Americans recognize deep down that this isn’t an ideal solution. It’s crucial to re-engage citizens in caring about local governance, reinstating responsibility for problem-solving at the state, local, and community levels. Removing legal and regulatory barriers is a significant step in empowering individuals for change. Additionally, reinforcing transparency measures at every level of local governance is key to enfranchising citizens in the decision-making process. Taking practical steps to match actions with internal beliefs about local change can catalyze permissionless innovation, a concept my colleague Todd Myers extensively explores in the environmental sphere.
In navigating the paradox between stated preferences for federal solutions and the underlying belief in the efficacy of local governance, we ought to forge a path that aligns actions with convictions, fostering a renewed commitment to the idea that the strength of change lies fundamentally in the hands of local communities.
Donald Kimball is the communications manager, free markets destroy lead and tech exchange editor at the Washington Policy Center.
Also read:
- Opinion: President Trump signs memorandum to protect the Snake River dams
Todd Myers argues that President Trump’s new memorandum rescinding Biden-era policies is a positive step toward protecting the Snake River dams, energy reliability, and salmon recovery. - Opinion: Why would C-TRAN Board members put the agency on the hook for $7.2 million annually if they don’t have to?Ken Vance questions why C-TRAN Board members would commit the agency to $7.2 million in annual light rail costs when the IBR administrator says alternative funding is possible.
- POLL: Is the IBR team listening to SW Washington?
A new poll invites Clark County residents to weigh in on whether local taxpayers should be responsible for the cost of light rail operations in the I-5 Bridge Replacement Program. - Opinion: How to use a two-way left turn laneDoug Dahl explains the legal and safety reasoning behind using two-way left turn lanes for both entering and exiting traffic.
- Opinion: Washington’s CO2 tax jumps 16% in just three months to about 46 cents per gallonIn an opinion column, Todd Myers of the Washington Policy Center argues that Washington’s carbon-tax price rose 16 percent last quarter to the equivalent of about 46 cents per gallon of gasoline, yet provides little measurable climate benefit.
