Mark Harmsworth writes that minimum wages sound compassionate, but they ignore basic economics: when labor costs spike artificially, employers reduce hiring, training, and expansion
Mark Harmsworth
Washington Policy Center
In a follow up to the Washington Policy Centers article showing the immediate negative effects of minimum wage increases in California, a new report from the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) has confirmed that high minimum wages means less jobs and less hours for workers.
The consequences of an aggressive $20-per-hour minimum wage for fast-food workers are now painfully clear. Assembly Bill 1228 (AB1228) enacted in September 2023 and taking full effect in April 2024, was hailed by Governor Gavin Newsom as a “win-win-win” for workers, businesses, and the economy.
The report from the NBER paints a starkly different picture: an estimated 18,000 fewer jobs in the fast-food sector alone, a direct fallout from the policy’s impact.
The NBER study, drawing on data from the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages, reveals a 2.7% employment drop in California’s fast-food industry compared to national trends from September 2023 to September 2024. Adjusting for pre-law trajectories bumps that figure to 3.2%, underscoring how the wage hike disrupted an already fragile recovery in the sector.
These aren’t abstract numbers, they translate to real families losing entry-level opportunities, particularly for young workers who rely on these jobs as steppingstones to further education and higher paying jobs.
Preempting the hike in minimum wage, chains like Pizza Hut axed 1,200 delivery driver roles. Post-implementation, restaurant closures multiplied, and automation surged, think self-service kiosks hastily installed by franchisees desperate to reduce labor costs.
The Employment Policies Institute quantifies the human toll: non-tipped restaurant workers forfeited up to 250 hours annually, equating to $4,000 in lost wages per employee, roughly seven weeks of full-time pay.
As minimum wage increases ripple across U.S. states, policymakers elsewhere must pay attention to what the data is showing. Higher wage floors don’t magically lift all boats; they often sink the smallest vessels first, fueling inflation in menu prices and reduced hours for those who need work most.
The Washington Policy Center has long advocated market-driven solutions over top-down mandates. Minimum wages sound compassionate, but they ignore basic economics: when labor costs spike artificially, employers reduce hiring, training, and expansion. The NBER’s findings aren’t outliers, they align with decades of research showing wage floors disproportionately harm low-skill sectors like fast food, where margins are razor-thin.
It’s time for a course correction. Lawmakers should prioritize skills training, tax incentives for small businesses, and deregulation to foster genuine opportunity. California’s experiment proves that good intentions pave a road to fewer paychecks.
Mark Harmsworth is the director of the Small Business Center at the Washington Policy Center.
Also read:
- Letter: ‘That is why the process matters’
The I-5 river bridge package is at roughly 30% design, meaning final construction drawings and final price are not yet set. - Letter: Forty years of Democrat governors’ judicial appointments
Tom Schenk argues 150 Democrat-appointed judges shape Washington courts with no impartial check. - Letter: The logistics crisis of universal mail-in voting
Jonathan Hines argues that roughly 70% of voters already bypass mail in favor of drop boxes and in-person delivery. - POLL: Would you support upgrading and reusing the existing Interstate Bridges if it saved billions of dollars?
Rep. John Ley questions whether $400M in bridge demolition costs could be redirected to other regional transportation needs. - Letter: TriMet’s history of over-predicting light rail ridership
TriMet’s MAX Green Line carried ~10,000–11,000 weekday riders in 2024–2026, less than a third of its 2020 forecast.
