David Boze of the Washington Policy Center provides insight on Elizabeth Hovde’s study on the state’s long-term-care program
Washington Policy Center
Today WPC released Center for Health Care Director Elizabeth Hovde’s new extensive study on the state’s long-term-care program, WA Cares. It reveals a program working against the inspiration for its existence — the need for people to prepare for long-term-care needs — with marketing that assures people that the new program will give the financial freedom when it will not. Ironically, the new state program is encouraging people to ignore preparing for possible long-term-care needs despite having a benefit that is not only already wildly insufficient for long-term care, but which will have to be cut (or the payroll tax that funds it will need to be raised), in order for the program to remain solvent.
The study also shows that the state’s cost-savings are miniscule (and questionable) compared to what Washington workers will be paying in the tax.
I’ve posted some takeaways I had from the study below. I urge you to take a look at them and consider reading the full Policy Brief. Don’t keep the information to yourself! Share the points that strike you with everyone you know!
- The WA Cares program is insolvent before it begins, facing a $15 billion shortfall.
- Between 2022-2053, workers will pay more than $30 billion for the state to realize net savings of just over $1.2 billion, assuming administrative costs don’t increase.
- The regressive tax in the law means some low-income workers will be forced to hand over a portion of their income to benefit others with higher incomes.
- It is likely the Employment Security Department will grant a monopoly to Service Employees International Union 775 (among the largest campaign donors in the state) to provide required training of family caregivers who could be obligated to pay them dues.
- The lifetime benefit of $36,500 is highly unlikely to provide for most people’s needs, making the state’s promises of financial security and “peace of mind” both false and dangerous.
- There is already legislative discussion that the 58-cent tax will need to increase or the benefit amount of $36,500 decrease to keep the program viable.
- At its starting tax rate (already expected to increase), a worker earning $25,000 will pay $145 each year, a worker making $50,000 will pay $290, those making $100,000 will pay $580 and so on.
- Private long-term-care plans typically start paying out when an elderly person needs help with two daily-life activities, while the state program will require a person to need help with at least three.
Read the full policy brief here.
David Boze is the communications director at the Washington Policy Center.
- Letter: ‘The (Vancouver School) district ignored or broke numerous rules to enforce the governor’s emergency mask rule’Brush Prairie resident Bill Eling outlines examples of Vancouver Public Schools’ ‘missteps’ in a lawsuit against a parent of a Skyview High School student.
- POLL: Do you support legislation that would lengthen the school year one week to address student learning loss during the COVID-19 pandemic?Do you support legislation that would lengthen the school year one week to address student learning loss during the COVID-19 pandemic?
- Opinion: ‘Democrats have been much better at the game of politics and elections than Republicans and that is hurting people like me’Clark County Today Editor Ken Vance pleads with Republicans to focus more on winning the war with Democrats than the battle with each other.
- Opinion: Washington’s gas prices have jumped 25 cents per gallon since CO2 tax took effectTodd Myers of the Washington Policy Center continues to make the case that the costs of that policy should be offset by tax cuts and that cost increases should be small.
- Opinion: SB 5236 isn’t the solution: More nurses are needed, not more regulationsElizabeth Hovde of the Washington Policy Center shares that creating more commissions, more oversight and threatening penalties is not going to get us more nurses.