Jason Mercier of the Washington Policy Center believes it is past time for Washington state officials to prioritize tax relief
Jason Mercier
Earlier this year the governor and Washington State Legislature prioritized spending increases with the state’s record revenue growth. With Washingtonians continuing to be crushed by record inflation, state officials should now finally embrace tax relief with today’s $1.5 billion increase in the June Revenue Forecast. Other public officials across the country, from the President of the United States to governors and lawmakers in other states, have seen the need to prioritize tax relief. It is past time for Washington state officials to do the same.
Here are the projected revenue increases in the June Revenue Forecast:
Steve Lerch, executive director of the Economic and Revenue Forecast Council, said about the forecast:
“Continued strong revenue collections and high inflation have again resulted in increases in the revenue forecast.”
Will this $1.5 billion increase in revenue mean a change of heart from the Governor on tax relief? His comments to date haven’t been encouraging. Explaining why he didn’t support broad-based tax relief before the 2022 session started, Governor Inslee said:
“I’m not sure in the middle of a pandemic, in the middle of a mental health crisis, in the middle of a homelessness crisis, in the middle of an educational crisis caused by our kids’ learning loss during COVID, that it’s really the right moment to be doing big tax cuts.”
Asked last month if a strong June revenue forecast could change his mind about tax relief, the Governor said (27:50 mark):
“The question is would the revenue forecast ever to make this so that there were more dollars than we needed for our children and their mental health and housing, I would be very surprised if the revenue forecast would be of that dimension. I would never eliminate a possibility, but I’d be very surprised.”
Many of the Governor’s Democratic colleagues, however, have taken a very different approach when it comes to tax relief to help with inflation. For example, in California and New York:
- New York: “Fuel prices have surged in recent months, hurting working families and small businesses the most, and it is crucial that we provide New Yorkers relief.” – Governor Hochul
- California: “My interest is to get the money out as quickly as possible. People are feeling deep stress, deep anxiety.” – Governor Newsom talking about gas tax rebates
State officials now have an additional $1.5 billion to finally prioritize tax relief to help Washingtonians mitigate some of the impacts of record inflation. Failing to do so will make it clear that taxpayers are merely viewed as an ATM for the politicians’ spending agendas, rather than being deemed worthy by their public servants of keeping more of their own money to meet their needs in the face of rapidly rising prices.
Jason Mercier is the director of the Center for Government Reform at the Washington Policy Center.
Also read:
- Opinion: Let’s make Washington state affordable for everyone
Rep. David Stuebe criticizes state lawmakers’ spending increases and calls for tax relief, budget reforms, and restored funding for essential services across Washington. - Opinion: Legislature agrees to increased spending in Supplemental Budget
Washington lawmakers approved an $80.2 billion supplemental budget, banking on an income tax that is uncertain to withstand legal and electoral tests despite increasing spending beyond revenue projections. - Letter: ‘Only Florida has a more regressive tax structure than Washington’
Washington households earning the least pay 13.8% in taxes, while the wealthiest 1% pay only 4.1%, according to Camas resident Anthony Teso’s letter. - Opinion: ‘I-5 Bridge replacement plan does not accomplish the needs of the project’
Transportation architect Kevin Peterson outlines why the current I-5 Bridge proposal falls short on mobility, urban design, and transit, and offers alternative solutions including BRT and urban integration improvements. - Opinion: Two ways to keep right
Doug Dahl explains how Washington drivers must “keep right” differently depending on whether traffic flows in one direction or both, plus the exceptions that apply to two-way turn lanes.
