Vancouver resident Katie Bauer offers her thoughts on the race

Editor’s note: Opinions expressed in this letter to the editor are those of the author alone and do not reflect the editorial position of ClarkCountyToday.com

Newcomer to the political scene, Kim Hamlik seems nice with an outgoing personality but are the people of Clark County going to get an experienced professional with knowledge of how the county runs? Unfortunately, Clark County voters have been down this path many times before with the likes of Julie Olson and Jamie Herrera Beutler to name a few. Case in point, Mrs. Hamlik admitted at one event that she didn’t know that the Clark County Council and the Clark County Board of Health are one in the same. She claims she has more time to give to the role but does more time equate to a stronger, more proficient county councilor? Or do we want a councilor who has more than 20 years of experience with multi-million-dollar contract negotiations when we need a new jail and bridge to be built? And a councilor candidate who without being an elected official, is already working with local agencies on the homeless issue? Do we want a councilor who is already fully aware of the latest Columbia River bridge project and is working with other candidates and current legislators to overcome the hurdles?

Recently, LifePac.org endorsed Michelle Belkot before the Aug. 2 primary election when they usually wait until the general election in November to endorse a candidate. Mrs. Hamlik was not endorsed by LifePac. What is Mrs. Hamlik’s stance on abortion?

Also, according to PDC filings, why does Mrs. Hamlik have Democrat Jim Moeller’s former treasurer as her own campaign treasurer? Anybody who has been around Clark County politics knows that Jim Moeller, former state representative (49 the District), is one of the most liberal Democrat politicians and to have the same treasurer is a very troubling choice to say the least. Also, Betty Sue Morris appears to have thrown her support to Mrs. Hamlik by donating so Republicans have to ask, is she really a Republican?

Lastly, in a recent candidate interview Mrs. Hamlik shared that she doesn’t believe the people of Clark County have a right to medical freedoms and she’d support in lockstep more lockdowns and follow “the experts.” Michelle Belkot said she stands with the people on this issue and believes we all deserve the right to make those choices for ourselves and our families and believes that Constitutional rights shouldn’t be tossed aside.

These questions are vital for the people of Clark County so we can all be informed voters. There are so many forums, meet and greets, and other events where you can ask these questions of all Clark County Councilor candidates. Based on what I’m seeing, I already know I’ll be voting for the most experienced, most qualified candidate for District 2 – Michelle Belkot.

Katie Bauer
Vancouver

---

Also read:

• 
  Opinion: Income Tax Battle Round Two – Signatures needed
  Let’s Go Washington needs 300,000+ signatures in under two months to put IP26-645 on the fall ballot.
• 
  Letter: Climate Commitment Act critique rests on fossil-funded denial
  Anthony Teso argues CCA repeal would transfer savings to Chevron and BP, not working families.
• 
  Letter: Why Petition IP26-645 is a stand for the people, not a political party
  IP26-645 needs 400,000 signatures by July 2 to repeal Washington’s new income-based tax.
• 
  Opinion: An important reason to keep the I-5 freeway system toll-free
  Sharon Nasset argues fuel tax sends 100% to transportation, while tolling sends only 60% of net funds.
• 
  Letter: Camas Voters – Keep your strong mayor
  Gary Perman argues Camas insiders behind the government shift review helped craft a bond voters rejected by nearly 90%.