Camas resident Anna Miller believes that by offering financial support and creating pathways for legal re-entry, this policy strikes a balance between enforcing immigration laws and supporting economic growth
Editor’s note: Opinions expressed in this letter to the editor are those of the author alone and do not reflect the editorial position of ClarkCountyToday.com
Last month, President Trump told Fox Noticias that his administration remains committed to removing violent criminals from the United States while also establishing a more structured self-deportation program. He emphasized that this approach provides individuals with financial assistance, making voluntary departure a more efficient process.
“We’re going to give them a stipend,” Trump stated in mid-April. “We’re going to give them some money and a plane ticket, and then we’re going to work with them — if they’re good — if we want them back in, we’re going to work with them to get them back in as quickly as we can.”
This marks a shift from previous self-deportation policies that relied on creating unfavorable conditions to encourage undocumented individuals to leave. Instead, the Trump administration’s program offers financial incentives, ensuring that individuals depart, with assistance, while maintaining the possibility of future legal re-entry.
Beyond addressing immigration concerns, the policy also helps American businesses struggling with labor shortages — particularly in the hospitality and agriculture industries. Trump has stated that his administration will work directly with farms and hotels to recommend workers for available positions, helping these industries thrive while ensuring a legal and orderly workforce.
“We’re doing a self-deportation, and we’re going to make it comfortable for people,” Trump said. “And we’re going to work with those people to come back into our country legally.”
However, individuals who choose not to self-deport could be subject to arrest and forced deportation by immigration authorities. The administration has made it clear that while the self-deportation program offers a dignified and voluntary process, enforcement measures will continue for those who remain unlawfully in the country.
By offering financial support and creating pathways for legal re-entry, this policy strikes a balance between enforcing immigration laws and supporting economic growth.
Anna Miller
Camas
Also read:
- Opinion: The unpreferred and unaffordable Interstate Bridge replacement proposal
Rep. John Ley argues that the Interstate Bridge Replacement proposal is unpreferred, unaffordable, and failing to address congestion, cost transparency, and community concerns. - POLL: If project costs continue to rise, what should lawmakers do with the I-5 Bridge replacement plan?
This poll asks readers what lawmakers should do with the I-5 Bridge replacement plan as costs rise and key decisions remain unresolved. - Opinion: IBR still holding and lying about coming billions in cost overruns
Joe Cortright argues that Interstate Bridge Replacement officials are deliberately delaying the release of an updated cost estimate that he says could push the project toward $10 billion. - Opinion: Another problem with strike pay from the UI fund – Potential double-dipping, overpayments
Elizabeth New (Hovde) argues that Washington’s new strike pay law risks overpayments and double-dipping unless workers are clearly warned at the point of applying for unemployment benefits. - Letter: A call for competent Interstate Bridge project management
Rick Vermeers argues that unchecked scope, rising costs, and missed timelines threaten the survival of the Interstate Bridge Replacement project unless light rail is removed.
wpDiscuz
