Fire District 3 Chief Scott Soreson addresses discussions for 2023 budget
Editor’s note: Opinions expressed in this letter to the editor are those of the author alone and do not reflect the editorial position of ClarkCountyToday.com
Transparency is key to earn the trust of our taxpayers. I wanted to update our community about operations and capital projects that we are considering for Clark County Fire District 3.
The Board of Fire Commissioners is in the process of discussing its budget for 2023 based on a strategic plan we passed in 2020. This includes a fire levy lid lift for operations and eventually a bond for another station. We want to stagger these funding requests to reduce impacts to taxpayers.
The priority for our community is to add additional emergency personnel to allow for three-person engine companies to meet the national standard. Two firefighters on an engine prevents us from entering a building for search and rescue. Our community has grown to the point where fire calls require this level of staffing.
We have approached the Clark County Council – without success – to pass impact fees on new development. (The city of Battle Ground already collects them.) Impact fees are paid by new growth and would be dedicated to the additional fire station. We would still need a bond, but it reduces the amount of that debt and saves taxpayers money.
Scott Sorenson, fire chief
Fire District 3
Also read:
- Opinion: House Committee seeks to cut student instruction time
Liv Finne of the Washington Policy Center states that if SB 5054 passes Washington will be the first state to fill classrooms with staff who are not qualified to teach. - Opinion: Workers’ paychecks will decrease in July, as Hail Mary passes fail to stop state programElizabeth Hovde also shares that the marketing also doesn’t tell you that the inadequate benefit doesn’t cover most people’s long-term-care needs, even if you do qualify.
- POLL: As a voter, are you more likely to approve a school district’s levy request after it is presented to you a second time?Levy requests by Washougal and Woodland schools were rejected by voters in February. Both are back on the April ballot. Are you more likely to vote to approve a levy request the second time?
- Opinion: A look at Washougal School District’s April 25 special election levy requestsThe district’s Board of Directors is asking voters to consider the same requests that were rejected in the Feb. 14 special election.
- Opinion: A second look at the Woodland School District replacement levyVoters are asked to consider the same levy request that was rejected in the February special election.
