Eric Lynch defends Washington’s voting system amid criticism
Editor’s note: Opinions expressed in this letter to the editor are those of the author alone and may not reflect the editorial position of ClarkCountyToday.com
I am writing because Bill Bruch’s August opinion piece on Washington’s voter rolls is being widely shared in my county, and it deserves a fact-based response. While Mr. Bruch raises serious concerns, his conclusions are partisan, misleading, and risk undermining public trust in elections by exaggerating problems far beyond reality.
First, let’s look at the numbers. Mr. Bruch cited a claim from Glen Morgan that “1 in 7 Washington voters are illegal under federal law,” extrapolating that to more than 700,000 supposedly invalid registrations. That claim simply is not true. The Washington Secretary of State’s office has clarified that the actual number of registered voters missing a driver’s license or Social Security record in the database is fewer than 13,000 statewide: a fraction of one percent of our nearly 5 million registered voters. And most of those are older voters who registered before federal law began requiring ID checks in 2002. In other words: clerical gaps in old records, not “illegal voters.”
Second, the op-ed takes data anomalies and rebrands them as fraud. Volunteer “canvassing” efforts that claimed 40% – 200% anomalies are not reliable audits. They typically flagged things like people who moved, changed names, or were away when volunteers knocked on doors. That doesn’t mean those voters are fake. Official post-election audits and bipartisan checks have consistently shown Washington elections to be secure, accurate, and free of widespread fraud.
Third, the claim that “if non-citizens can get a driver’s license, they will automatically be registered to vote” is false. Washington’s Automatic Voter Registration system requires an attestation of citizenship, and knowingly registering or voting as a non-citizen is already a felony. Errors are exceedingly rare, and when they do happen, they are corrected.
Fourth, Mr. Bruch portrays Washington’s mail-in voting as “not secure.” That ignores years of bipartisan audit data confirming otherwise. Every ballot is signature-verified, logged, and subject to multiple layers of security. Mail delivery issues happen occasionally, but they are monitored and mitigated. Suggesting our entire system is insecure undermines confidence without evidence.
Finally, the op-ed pushes Initiative IL26-126, which would require documentary proof of citizenship for all voters, even those who have been registered and voting for decades. While this may sound simple, in practice it would strip thousands of legal voters of their rights if they lack access to documents like a passport, certified birth certificate, or naturalization papers. Rural voters, seniors, students, and lower-income residents would be most affected. That is not election integrity – that is voter suppression.
The truth is this: Washington’s elections are already secure. Our rolls are constantly updated, errors are corrected, and multiple audits confirm that fraud is vanishingly rare. Exaggerating minor clerical gaps into hundreds of thousands of “illegal voters” is not responsible reporting: it is partisan messaging designed to erode trust and push a policy agenda.
We should always strive to improve our election system. But improvement should mean making voting both secure and accessible for every eligible citizen. Fear-mongering about “illegal voters” may serve partisan goals, but it does nothing to strengthen democracy.
For the sake of our communities, I urge readers to seek facts from official, nonpartisan sources such as the Secretary of State’s office, and to resist narratives that cast doubt on free and fair elections without evidence. Washington’s system works, and we should protect it.
Eric Lynch
Washington state
Also read:
- Letter: Interstate Bridge Replacement $13.6 billion estimate is too low!
Bob Ortblad argues the Interstate Bridge Replacement Program’s $13.6 billion cost estimate understates the true expense, citing comparable projects, construction challenges, and engineering assumptions. - Opinion: ‘The drama and the waste of taxpayer money continues’
Rep. John Ley outlines his objections to the approved fixed-span I-5 Bridge design, citing cost concerns, engineering standards, funding uncertainty, and opposition to light rail and tolls. - Coast Guard approves fixed-span design for new Interstate Bridge
The U.S. Coast Guard has approved a fixed-span design for the new Interstate Bridge, clearing a major hurdle for the Interstate Bridge Replacement project. - Business Profile: Handel’s Ice Cream opens its first shop in Washington, in Vancouver
Handel’s Ice Cream has opened its first Washington location in east Vancouver, with a grand opening planned for Jan. 17. - Opinion: Why vote no on the Battle Ground School District levy?
Dick Rylander outlines why he believes voters should reject the Battle Ground School District levy, citing costs, enrollment trends, test results, and district spending priorities. - Letter: The multi-million dollar cash grab in Washington schools
Yacolt resident Mark Rose argues that rising superintendent salaries conflict with classroom cuts and repeated levy requests in Clark County school districts. - Discover your future at WSU Vancouver’s Preview Day, Jan. 24
WSU Vancouver will host a free Preview Day on Jan. 24, offering prospective students and families an inside look at campus life and academic opportunities.
An old expression we used to bandy about went “if you can’t dazzle them with brilliance, then baffle them with bull hockey!” And in this instance of the author portraying above board voter elections in WA state, I am going with the later characterization.
From paragraph to paragraph Mr. Lynch plays his hand with conclusions that mock objectivity and border on pollyannish claims that the Dept. of Licensing and the WA Secretary of State(SOS) administrations are completely above scrutiny.
Though he does acknowledge serious considerations and the need for improvement, somehow his suppositions are glossed over and accusations of “…partisanship and lack of reality…” are made. I have been voting since the early ’70s, and not once in those days could I receive a ballot and enter into the voting booth unless I presented valid identification, to wit my voter registration card and a pictured form of government identification.
Mr. Lynch’s claim that the ballots are secure belies for example, the recent trend of firebombing voter ballot boxes. As a sidenote, just this month a citizen in Maine received in a package hundreds of ballots from Amazon. If this kind of activity is allowed to blossom unchecked what measure of check and balance will bring trust to the voting process.
For example, the Dept of Justice is bringing legal action against WA SOS for failure to provide voter rolls in order to verify voter registration accuracy. However, WA SOS refuses to comply with the request by citing and linking privacy concerns regarding illegal immigration. This privacy concern is a farce. I have had my identity compromised, both in the private and public sectors, to the point that it seems that more people have access to my identity then I do. Unfortunately I am not alone in this regard.
Why would someone refuse an audit to merely verify the accuracy of voter rolls? Only one thing stands to that reason and that is to squelch an audit.
We are in an age of personal information being bought, sold, stolen, misrepresented and passed around like it’s a commodity. Open the books and let some light in. Audits are good, protective, and empowering and no ‘above board organization’ should shy away from one!
Finally, I do agree with Mr. Lynch in seeking to improve our voting system, because it needs to be done.