La Center resident Barry Wells says it’s time for a serious conversation about transparency, affordability, and fairness in our state’s energy policies
Editor’s note: Opinions expressed in this letter to the editor are those of the author alone and may not reflect the editorial position of ClarkCountyToday.com
As a longtime Washington resident, I’m deeply concerned about the relentless rise in gas prices — driven not just by market forces, but by our own legislature’s decisions. Since 2016, Washington state has steadily increased its gas tax, and recent hikes have pushed us into the top tier of the most expensive states for fuel. As of July 2024, the gas tax rose to 55.4 cents per gallon, a 6-cent jump from the previous rate. And that’s just the beginning — annual inflation adjustments and future increases are already baked into the law.
But what’s truly frustrating is the added burden from the Climate Commitment Act (CCA), enacted in 2023. This cap-and-trade program requires fuel suppliers to purchase carbon allowances at quarterly auctions to cover their emissions. These costs — now exceeding $64 per allowance—are passed directly to consumers at the pump. Yet unlike the state gas tax, this carbon cost isn’t itemized. It’s embedded in the price, making it a hidden tax. Analysts estimate it adds roughly 46 to 51 cents per gallon for gasoline and even more for diesel.
Drivers see the pain at the pump — over $4.38 per gallon, more than a dollar above the national average — but they’re not told why. There’s no transparency, no breakdown, just higher prices. And while the state touts this as a climate solution, there’s little evidence yet that it’s reducing emissions. Meanwhile, nearly $3.5 billion has been collected under the program, with no updated carbon inventories released since 2021.
I support responsible environmental stewardship, but not when it’s used as a blank check to tax working families. These policies disproportionately hurt rural communities, low-income drivers, and small businesses. Legislators must be held accountable for the financial strain they’ve placed on everyday Washingtonians under the guise of climate action.
It’s time for a serious conversation about transparency, affordability, and fairness in our state’s energy policies.
Barry Wells
Fargher Lake
Also read:
- Fiscal fallout: $375 million bond debt indirectly funding operating budget
Shifting $375 million from a loan fund impacts local infrastructure as Washington state covers operating costs with bond debt, prompting concern among officials and advocacy groups. - Lawsuit aims to block new eligibility requirements for WA sheriffs
Four sheriffs are suing over a state law that sets new eligibility rules, arguing it undermines voter authority by allowing removal for certification issues. - Opinion: The growing gap between public voice and political power
Todd Myers describes how large-scale protest and sign-ins often fail to sway state leaders, and argues authentic influence is most likely found through local action. - City of Battle Ground seeks applicants for Salary Commission vacancy
Battle Ground seeks a resident to join its independent Salary Commission, which reviews compensation and health benefits for local elected officials through 2027. - Opinion: Who is winning the race for affordable power?
Hydroelectric power keeps Washington competitive, but new laws and carbon pricing are driving up electricity costs for residents each year. - Vancouver Fire Department assists with Columbia River Marina fire response
Vancouver Fire Department joined Clark-Cowlitz and Scappoose crews to help fight a vessel and dock fire at Goble Marina, assisting in river operations where one boat sank and another was partially submerged. - White House govt. Funding request for 2027 cuts $73 billion
President Trump’s budget seeks to boost defense funding while cutting $73 billion from agencies like the EPA, NASA, and Agriculture, prompting sharp criticism from Democratic leaders.
wpDiscuz
