
Bob Ortblad suggests elected officials and community leaders should take a field trip to Seattle’s Chinatown
Editor’s note: Opinions expressed in this letter to the editor are those of the author alone and do not reflect the editorial position of ClarkCountyToday.com
The Interstate Bridge Replacement Program (IBR) has intentionally concealed the impact of its bridge approaches by providing misleading graphics. The 16 legislators on the Joint Committee on the I-5 Bridge, the Vancouver City Council, and the Hayden Island Neighborhood Network should take a joint field trip to Seattle’s Chinatown. This will help them visualize the IBR’s devastating plans for Vancouver and Hayden Island.


They should take Amtrak to Seattle’s Union Station and walk five blocks up South Jackson St., then walk another 100 yards under an elevated I-5 freeway. Walk one more block to 12th Avenue South to visit Seattle’s largest drug market.
In 1968, WSDOT cut I-5 through Seattle’s historic Chinatown. For six decades the impacts of this concrete nightmare have been inflicted on Chinatown with no relief in sight.
The South Jackson St. underpass is about 100 yards long. The IBR plans a Columbia Way 130-yard underpass. Vancouver’s $21 million “Main Street Promise” will end at an ugly underpass, and it will be a dark 200-yard walk under the freeway to get to the riverfront. The IBR plans three separate 100-yard underpasses for Hayden Island covering a dozen acres with a forest of concrete pillars.
The IBR fraudulently disqualified an immersed tunnel alternative design with no underpasses and that would enhance both riverbanks with waterfront parks.
Bob Ortblad MSCE, MBA
Seattle, WA
Also read:
- Opinion: A year in review of news stories from a former sports guyClark County Today reporter Paul Valencia reflects on his evolving role, revisiting major news, community debates, sports moments, and human-interest stories that shaped Clark County in 2025.
- Opinion: Ready for another pay decrease from the state? It happens Jan. 1Elizabeth New (Hovde) argues that Washington’s Paid Family and Medical Leave payroll tax increase will further reduce workers’ take-home pay beginning Jan. 1.
- Opinion: Justice for none – Court hands down a mandate without a dime to fund itNancy Churchill argues that a Washington Supreme Court ruling on public defense imposes costly mandates on local governments without providing funding to implement them.
- Letter: When headlines gaslight the publicVancouver resident Peter Bracchi argues that emotionally charged immigration headlines blur legal distinctions and mislead the public rather than inform it.
- Opinion: California’s unemployment debt crisis mirrors Washington’s Employment Security Department failuresMark Harmsworth compares California’s growing unemployment insurance debt with Washington’s Employment Security Department failures and argues both states must reform or risk continued economic harm.







