Steve May offers his support for ‘Yes’ votes on Proposition 10 and Proposition 11
Editor’s note: Opinions expressed in this letter to the editor are those of the author alone and do not reflect the editorial position of ClarkCountyToday.com
Regarding the upcoming Ridgefield School District’s bond issue votes. I received the Voters’ Pamphlet and frankly, I was shocked, shocked I say, at the superficiality of Ms Pozzo’s statement against voting in favor of the bond measures. A proper response would take pages — I’ll try to abbreviate this.

If one is trying to convince voters to vote “no” on a contested issue it might be wise to provide more than the superficial generalities she provided if you want to be taken seriously.
“You get no say in the design.” Well, since all the citizens of Ridgefield are licensed architects or urban planners let’s just have everyone submit their own favorite design, complete with all the required mandated facilities systems. Sounds good.
“If passed, more bonds will follow.” Duh. We live in the fastest growing town in Washington, so I’m sure in a few years when these newest schools are bursting with newly arrived students, surely no one will want a new school paid for by bonds. I know — Ms Pozzo and her group can fund the next school(s) and save the voters the expense. Thanks!
Who knew — when you take out a mortgage (or bond) you have to pay interest! If Ms Pozzo’s math is correct (I don’t deal in numbers this large) we’ll pay $40 million over 21 years on a $70 million bond. Do you have a mortgage on your house? A $300,000 mortgage (with a $60,000 down payment) requires about $170,000 in interest. Seems kinda, I don’t know, “normal” to me.
Ms Pozzo says the schools don’t “need all the extras for the community.” I would hope most people disagree with this myopic view — there are very few locations in Ridgefield or any other town where “the community” can interact with one another and schools provide the perfect forum. If not the schools — where? Here’s a suggestion Ms Pozzo may like — let’s just provide basketball courts and football fields with no seating or non-student access since they’re just an “extra” for “the community.”
There could be many more of these — I’ll close with one more. “New roofs? . . . Why not through regular maintenance? Contrary to what Ms Pozzo says almost 1,400 new students have arrived in the past six years. The district is struggling to accommodate them, and some maintenance has been deferred. Perhaps Ms Pozzo will invite all of us over to her house so we can observe how to immaculately care for a home while staying on top of every conceivable household system.
This might be overly aggressive and too long, but if people are going to argue we should not pass good faith bond proposals that benefit our children, they owe us specifics and not hollow statements offering nothing but “No.”
Steve May
Ridgefield
Also read:
- Letter: IBR/Light rail and chronic homelessnessVancouver resident Bob Zak criticizes city council’s light rail endorsement and calls for tougher homeless policies.
- Opinion: Why the Electoral College remains vital for our RepublicMountain States Policy Center analyst defends constitutional system against National Popular Vote Compact movement.
- Opinion: Exposed — Democrat motivations on the income tax and fraud at DCYFSen. John Braun demands investigation after audit reveals $37 million in questionable DCYF daycare payments.
- Opinion: Crashes, crime, and confusion – Who’s responsible in parking lots?Target Zero Manager Doug Dahl explains why police rarely patrol grocery store parking lots and what drivers can do.
- POLL: Should Clark County’s 2022 anti-light rail resolution still guide council decisions today?Wednesday’s council meeting reignited debate over the county’s 2022 resolution requiring voter approval for light rail projects.







