
Gary Perman says ‘Camas can fix its mismanagement in other ways besides creating a new taxing authority’
Editor’s note: Opinions expressed in this letter to the editor are those of the author alone and may not reflect the editorial position of ClarkCountyToday.com
Over the past few weeks, my inbox has been overflowing with messages from Camas and Washougal residents:
“Didn’t we already vote this down?”

“Yes we did. No still means no.”
“So why is it back on the ballot? Do they think we’re stupid?”
The Money Trail
The firefighters’ union is pouring serious cash and manpower into promoting this measure and that alone should make taxpayers pause. When a special-interest group spends heavily to “educate” voters, it’s rarely about safety. It’s about securing bigger budgets and long-term control.
You’ve probably heard the sales pitch: “It’s only the cost of a weekly cup of coffee.”
Here’s what they don’t tell you:
- Only 2% of all fire calls are actual structure fires.
- A single 2017 safety fine cost $4,800 for not having a second fire truck at a house fire – not “millions.”
- The RFA doesn’t expand coverage, add services, or hire more staff on $1.05/$1,000
- Creating the RFA adds another taxing authority, one that can (and will) raise your taxes.
In fact, a taxpayer-funded survey found that 87% of residents are satisfied with fire services, and 90% are satisfied with EMS. Clearly, the fire system isn’t broken.
What’s Actually Changing?
Not the service.
Not the management.
Not the leadership.
Just the tax burden.
Here’s what that looks like for Camas taxpayers:
| Tax Component | Rate per $1,000 |
|---|---|
| RFA Tax | $1.05 |
| Camas City Tax | $1.90 (current) |
| EMS Levy | $0.46 |
| Fire Building Levy | $0.20 |
| Minus City Tax | –$0.71* |
| Total | $2.90 |
Average Camas home value: $731,000
→ $2.90 × 731 = $2,119.90 per year
The actual cost of fire services, according to the City’s Director of Finance, is $0.88 per $1,000. Yet the Council, advised by both the Director and the City Administrator, voted to return only $0.71 per $1,000 effectively creating double taxation for residents.
Same staff. Same leadership. Same service. Higher taxes.
No increase in emergency coverage.
No expansion of services.
Same management running the show.
The only thing expanding is the government’s ability to tax you more, automatically by 1% per year, plus a likely new levy within two years of the RFA’s creation to ask you for MORE money.
Camas can fix its mismanagement in other ways besides creating a new taxing authority.
Gary Perman
concerned taxpayer
Camas/Washougal
Also read:
- Opinion: Fighting for affordability and protecting your rightsRep. John Ley provides a legislative update focused on affordability, parental rights, healthcare costs, and major transportation challenges, including the IBR project.
- Opinion: A Commie in Gotham CityLars Larson’s latest column criticizes Democratic victories across the nation, highlighting what he views as troubling trends in liberal politics from coast to coast.
- Bart Hansen gives election perspective from city councilor who was not on the ballotVancouver City Councilor Bart Hansen reflected on election night, expressing gratitude to candidates, support for Proposition 5, opposition to Charter Amendment No. 13, and a call for more open public communication.
- Preliminary results show voters rejecting Charter Amendment No. 13Preliminary results show Vancouver voters rejecting Charter Amendment No. 13, which proposed creating voting districts for City Council elections, with 14,800 voting no and 11,235 voting yes.
- Preliminary results show voter support for Vancouver Proposition 5, Police Services LevyPreliminary results show Vancouver voters supporting Proposition 5, a police services levy expected to raise $6 million annually for six years to fund officers, equipment, and public safety improvements.







