Camas resident Gary Perman encourages others to vote NO on RFA Proposition 1 in Camas-Washougal
Editor’s note: Opinions expressed in this letter to the editor are those of the author alone and do not reflect the editorial position of ClarkCountyToday.com
If you vote for the RFA, here’s what changes:

- New taxing authority will take $1.05 per $1,000 of assessed home value—costing you $300-$1,000 per year.
- They can raise taxes by 3% annually starting in 2026—without your vote. (new WA. Legislation)
- Camas plans to borrow millions to loan to the RFA at below-market interest rates, costing taxpayers even more.
What doesn’t change?
- Same firefighters, equipment, and leadership.
- The new firehouse and EMS levy you’re already paying for aren’t included in the RFA.
- The same city council that led the current business model will lead the new RFA.
Does this make financial sense?
No responsible financial advisor would recommend taking out a loan just to lend it to another person at below-market rates. Yet, that’s exactly what Camas plans to do.
Camas can’t afford to properly fund police equipment upgrades, according to the proponents of the defeated Utility tax increase in February, but they CAN afford to borrow money to subsidize a new taxing authority? This model doesn’t add up—and it’s the taxpayers who will foot the bill.
Vote NO on RFA Proposition 1 in Camas Washougal.
Gary Perman
Camas
Also read:
- An icy reception for Gov. Bob Ferguson’s proposed budget cutsAdvocates for schools, child care, higher education, and climate programs sharply criticized Gov. Bob Ferguson’s proposed budget cuts during early legislative hearings.
- Opinion: Washington should stop shielding domestic abusers and sexual offenders from deportationVancouver attorney Angus Lee argues Washington law improperly shields convicted domestic abusers, sexual offenders, and drunk drivers from deportation and urges lawmakers to change it.
- Opinion: Who is leaving Washington and why the politicians need to careMark Harmsworth argues Washington is losing higher-income taxpayers and business owners, warning that rising taxes and regulation threaten long-term economic stability.
- Opinion: Democrats in Olympia are backing Senate Bill 5974Sen. John Braun argues Senate Bill 5974 would undermine local control by allowing an unelected board to decertify elected county sheriffs across Washington.
- Opinion: When the state orders discounts and sends you the billNancy Churchill argues that HB 2373 would raise electric rates by shifting the cost of mandated low-income utility discounts onto local ratepayers, particularly in rural Washington counties.








As hard as it is to admit we have a problem and need a solutiuon. These cities should not be in the fire business and the interlocal agreement is not working.
Garry what is your alternative? Keep going the same route making decisions between two separate councils, two cities with different budgets and needs? Love to hear your thoughts on a solution. Your changes listed our misleading and ill-informed.