Amboy resident Thomas Schenk shares his thoughts on the one-party rule by Democrats in Olympia
Editor’s note: Opinions expressed in this letter to the editor are those of the author alone and do not reflect the editorial position of ClarkCountyToday.com
So … Democrat one-party rule in Olympia strikes again.
Of the four hundred plus bills passed by the Legislature in Olympia this last session, forty-seven had an “emergency clause” included in the language of the bill.
Legislation passed in Olympia is usually subject to a referendum by citizens. The “emergency clause” in these forty-seven bills allows the passed legislation to take effect immediately, preventing citizens of Washington State from pursuing a remedy for such legislation through the referendum process.
Usually, once legislation is signed by the Governor, citizens have ninety days to initiate a referendum for voters to stop implementation of such legislation.
This “emergency clause” immediately implements a bill, short-circuiting the referendum process. With the referendum process now denied to citizens, the initiative process is the only other method voters have to try and walk back legislation.
I’ve heard Democrats, in the next session of the Legislature, will attempt to stymie any effort to start an initiative to overturn a bill which has taken effect due to the “emergency clause”, effectively silencing Washington citizens.
The Democrats will attempt to prevent such an initiative by passing legislation in the next session shortening the time allowed to gather signatures and to increase the number of signatures required to get it on the ballot.
The gist of all of this is Democrat one-party rule is curtailing the voice of Washington State citizens by using an “emergency clause” to have legislation take effect immediately, bypassing the voter’s option of a referendum against such legislation and, subsequently, if successful in changing the parameters of the initiative process, also impairing citizen’s use of that process to put the question before the voters of the State.
I understand there is one other “emergency clause” giving the Governor authority, based upon “factual scientific data” of a pandemic, which would force Washingtonians to be vaccinated or immunized against their will.
Who gets to decide exactly what “factual scientific data” is?
One-party rule gives Democrats the ability to stack a potential pool of experts with their own like-minded brethren, who would eagerly echo whatever Democrats were alleging.
We had so-called “factual scientific data” during Covid 19, which is now being revealed as not so “factually scientific”!
Most of Red State America is maintaining, or gaining ground, on the erosion of the rights of citizen’s voices to be heard and acknowledged by elected officials.
Aside from actually voting for Governor, state Senators, Representatives and other elected state officials, we now see Blue State Washington Democrats steadily eroding the ability of voters to affect changes to ill-conceived legislation.
Isn’t it great! Voters no longer have to worry about those pesky details of one-party legislation…that’s all decided now by omnipotent legislators, who know best on how to run yours and your family’s lives!
It’s said sarcasm is the lowest form of wit … I don’t think this situation is funny, but it’s sometimes necessary to make a point!
Thomas Schenk
Amboy
Also read:
- POLL: After hearing state leaders describe the I-5 Bridge as vulnerable in an earthquake, what is your reaction?
State and local leaders describe the I-5 Bridge as structurally at risk but recommend drivers continue crossing it while complex replacement plans unfold. - Opinion: Historical state income tax and another massive operating budget highlight the end of the 2026 legislative session
Rep. John Ley details the passage of a state income tax, an expanding $80 billion budget, and new Clark County infrastructure funding following the 2026 legislative session. - VIDEO: Legal challenges certain as Gov. Ferguson prepares to sign new income tax
Senate Minority Leader John Braun and other legislators expect legal challenges and initiative efforts to follow Gov. Ferguson’s signature on Washington’s new income tax law affecting high earners and businesses. - Opinion: Fighting for transparency in Washington government
A recent court decision allows Washington lawmakers broad new secrecy over internal records, as advocates report rising obstacles to government transparency and public engagement. - New Washington law clarifies what is an ‘election’
After a court ruling challenged the state’s definition of “election,” lawmakers clarified the law to prevent double voting and maintain the integrity of Washington’s ballots.
wpDiscuz
