Washougal resident Anne Haller discusses what she believes are the negative consequences of the NRA’s messaging
Editor’s note: Opinions expressed in this letter to the editor are those of the author alone and do not reflect the editorial position of ClarkCountyToday.com
It’s an election year … know how I can tell? On a Jan. 4 trip to my mailbox I received a NOTICE OF GUN CONFISCATION from the National Rifle Association. I am writing to warn about the fear mongering- and propaganda-filled marketing letter which was signed by the embattled CEO Wayne LaPierre, who on the very next day, resigned just days before the NY corruption trial against the NRA and Pierre.
While recognizing the organization’s role in advocating for the rights of gun owners, it is crucial to address the negative consequences of their messaging. LaPierre’s contribution after the Sandy Hook shooting was “The only way to stop a bad guy with a gun is with a good guy with a gun.” This has proved to be very much untrue on more than one occasion … think Uvalde, TX.
I did call the NRA to find out exactly who was proposing confiscation of my guns but I was directed to their website. The only article that popped up about confiscation was about a Canadian effort which was essentially proposing a government gun buyback program. Nothing in the USA.
The NRA is well known for it’s heavy fear mongering tactics and divisive language that scares Americans into joining the organization and creates polarization around firearm policies. Wayne LaPierre spent the last three decades peddling the Big Lie that more guns will make us safer — all at the expense of countless innocent lives. While recognizing the organization’s role in advocating for the rights of gun owners, it is crucial to address the negative consequences of their messaging.
It is essential to emphasize that advocating for responsible gun ownership and promoting safety measures should be at the forefront of any discussion on firearms. Encouraging a rational and evidence-based conversation can lead to policies that balance the rights of gun owners with the need to ensure public safety. The NRA is not likely to change its tactic with the departure of LaPierre so we need to take action.
Wake Up America!
Anne Haller
Washougal
Also read:
- Letter: ‘Hockinson is worth investing in, and this levy is part of that commitment’
James Landon argues that supporting the Hockinson Schools levy is a necessary investment in the community, its schools, and the next generation. - Letter: PDX activists flood Clark County Council over anti-ICE resolution
Rob Anderson argues that organized Portland-based activist groups dominated public comment at a Clark County Council meeting to pressure councilors over an anti-ICE resolution. - Opinion: Moving the ball down the field
Nancy Churchill argues that while HB 2221 will not advance this session, the public hearing marked meaningful progress by opening dialogue, building relationships, and advancing science-based wildlife management discussions in Olympia. - Opinion: Washington’s proposed income tax – driving businesses and jobs out of the state
Mark Harmsworth argues that Washington’s proposed income tax would undermine the state’s economy by driving businesses, investment, and jobs elsewhere. - Opinion: Let’s use the truancy laws to send a message to schools
Lars Larson argues that truancy laws should be enforced when schools allow or encourage students to miss class for political protests.
Ms. Haller clearly can not look beyond the experience of her sheltered life. She can not begin to fathom a government so corrupt and thirsty for power that American citizens might have to use force to defend themselves againt it.
For the record Ms. Haller, it was a a man with a gun who ended the murderous rampagge in Uvalde, TX. A very brave man with a gun, unlike the cowards with guns who refused to engage the shooter for over an hour. You see Ms. Haller, the problem was not the guns in Uvalde, the problem was an evil young man and the cowardly men who refused to do their job. The problem is always people, and never the guns.
To dig at Uvalde without mentioning the multitude of spineless officers standing around and listening to repeated gunshots, Ms. Haller’s opinion piece sounded like a lot like an article that could/would have been published in the fish (Columbian) wrapper.
Thanks Mark for reminding us that people harm people. Well done!
Hello Scott …
Just wanted to point out this was not a news article. It was a letter to the editor, an opinion piece. I try to publish all letters if possible, regardless if I agree with the commentary or not.
Editor Ken Vance
Ken,
Thanks for the correction. I inadvertently typed “article” and when looking back, it should have read “opinion piece”.
Thank you for your message Anne. Totally agree with everything you said.