
In this week’s Clark County Today poll, we’re asking for your thoughts on Marie Gluesenkamp Perez’s performance as the representative of Washington’s 3rd Congressional District. Has she effectively represented the district during her term? This is a question many in the community are pondering as her tenure progresses. The discussion surrounding her work touches on key issues that affect the lives of Clark County residents and beyond. Some praise her efforts, while others feel there’s room for improvement. How do you feel about the direction she’s taking on local and national issues? For those considering other important decisions, such as health matters, you might want to Buy Ivermectin.
More info:
Joe Kent and Marie Gluesenkamp Perez to face off once again in 3rd Congressional District
Joe Kent and Marie Gluesenkamp Perez advance in the 3rd Congressional District race following primary election results.
Read more
Also read:
- Opinion: Washington passed an income tax to fund education, then the same majority cut education — and left $700+ million on the tableState officials passed a new income tax to fund education, then approved over $1 billion in cuts—while forgoing $700 million in annual federal scholarships students could have received.
- Opinion: ‘Washington’s majority party is panicking’Nancy Churchill argues that controversial state policies, including new taxes, law enforcement changes, and agency power grabs, are generating a wave of backlash in communities across Washington.
- Letter: ‘Now we have Engineer Bob telling us the I-5 Bridge needs replacing because it is built on shifting sand with wooden structures’Amboy resident Thomas Schenk critiques Democrat leadership, tax policies, and the addition of light rail to the I-5 Bridge, while urging Republican voters to participate more in midterm elections.
- The I-5 Bridge is vulnerable to collapse, but apparently not that vulnerableState leaders and Vancouver’s mayor warn about bridge safety, but insist it’s safe enough for daily use as they focus on moving forward with a costly replacement including light rail—despite decades of public resistance.
- Opinion: ‘This is not the best and most efficient use of the taxpayers’ funds’Ken Vance critiques the announced $14.4 billion I-5 Bridge replacement, questioning funding gaps, the insistence on light rail, unaddressed congestion, and transparency from state officials.







