This week, President Donald Trump fulfilled a campaign promise by announcing his gender clarity policy, stating that the federal government will only recognize two sexes—male and female. This move has renewed the debate over transgender participation in sports, especially in states like Washington, where student-athletes have been allowed to compete based on gender identity for nearly two decades. Supporters argue that the policy protects female athletes and maintains fairness in competition, while opponents view it as discriminatory and harmful to transgender individuals. Where do you stand on this issue? Cast your vote in this week’s CCT Poll! ⬇️
More info:
Opinion: How will President Trump’s gender clarity position impact transgender sports participation?
Ken Vance examines how President Trump's gender policy could influence transgender participation in Washington state sports.
Read more
Also read:
- Opinion: When you’ve lost Christine Gregoire, you’ve lost Washington
Former Gov. Gregoire says Washington’s $80B budget reflects a spending problem, not an income problem. - Letter: Present bridge plan has been in the expensive and unworkable planning stage far too long with no real end in sight
Brush Prairie resident Bob Mattila argues the I-5 Bridge plan doubles costs by including light rail on the span. - Letter: Stop turning gas prices into war propaganda
Camas resident Tony Teso fires back at Jonathan Hines, arguing militarism won’t lower fuel costs for working families. - Letter: Compassion requires accountability
A medical provider and downtown Vancouver resident challenges whether current homelessness policies produce measurable results. - POLL: Should C-TRAN taxpayers be protected from paying additional costs tied to extending light rail to Library Square?
C-TRAN’s board asked IBR to extend light rail to Library Square but voted down taxpayer cost protections.
