
This week, President Donald Trump fulfilled a campaign promise by announcing his gender clarity policy, stating that the federal government will only recognize two sexes—male and female. This move has renewed the debate over transgender participation in sports, especially in states like Washington, where student-athletes have been allowed to compete based on gender identity for nearly two decades. Supporters argue that the policy protects female athletes and maintains fairness in competition, while opponents view it as discriminatory and harmful to transgender individuals. Where do you stand on this issue? Cast your vote in this week’s CCT Poll! ⬇️
More info:
Opinion: How will President Trump’s gender clarity position impact transgender sports participation?
Ken Vance examines how President Trump's gender policy could influence transgender participation in Washington state sports.
Read more
Also read:
- Opinion: ‘Seeking might over right destroys representative government’Retired judge Dave Larson argues that prioritizing political power over constitutional principles has undermined representative government and calls for renewed civic responsibility.
- Letter: ‘Immigration’ resolution scheduled for this Wednesday at Clark County Council MeetingRob Anderson urges residents to closely watch an upcoming Clark County Council meeting where an immigration-related resolution and proposed rule changes are expected to be discussed.
- Opinion: The 1700-square-foot solution to Washington’s housing crisisAn opinion column arguing that Washington’s energy code has driven up housing costs and outlining how HB 2486 aims to limit those impacts for smaller, more affordable homes.
- Letter: Public school visionClark County resident Larry Roe urges a deeper community discussion about public school priorities, levy funding, and the long-term affordability of education for local families.
- Opinion: House Bill 1834 would create a regulatory nightmare and restricts parental control on social mediaMark Harmsworth argues that House Bill 1834 would undermine parental authority and create sweeping regulatory and legal risks under the guise of protecting minors online.







