Opponents of the bill have contended that school districts across Washington were only confused after State Superintendent Chris Reykdal sent letters telling districts not to comply with I-2081 due to conflicts with state and federal student privacy laws
Carleen Johnson
The Center Square Washington
Monday’s public hearing on Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill 5181 before the House Education Committee saw supporters and detractors make their respective cases for and against the controversial legislation.
ESSB 5181 aims to amend voter-approved Initiative 2081 – dubbed the parents’ bill of rights – to align it with existing state law. Critics claim it essentially guts I-2081. The bill passed the full Senate on Feb. 5 on a party-line 30-19 vote before moving to the House of Representatives for consideration.
Bill sponsor Claire Wilson, D-Federal Way, told the committee that passing the bill is necessary to clear up confusion surrounding the implementation of I-2081, which voters passed in November. I-2081 ensures that schools notify parents about issues related to their children, including mental health and medical decisions, as well as gender-related counseling or medical care.
“When we passed the parents’ rights initiative last year, we said from day one, if needed, we would come back and make changes,” Wilson continued. “Changes are needed because poorly written provisions in the initiative caused confusion.”
Opponents of the bill have contended that school districts across Washington were only confused after State Superintendent of Public Instruction Chris Reykdal sent letters telling districts not to comply with I-2081 due to conflicts with state and federal student privacy laws.
“The title of the bill says it’s ‘An act related to amending the parents’ rights initiative to bring it into existing law,’” Rep. Travis Couture, R-Allyn, said. “The parents’ rights initiative is existing law, so how could the underlying bill actually amend it and be in order with the title?”
Nicole Kern with Planned Parenthood spoke in support of the bill, arguing that protecting student privacy is paramount.
“Parents would still be notified of most health care decisions, except in very limited areas around reproductive care and mental health,” she said.
Pierce County Pastor Eric Lundberg was the final person to testify in opposition to the bill.
“This bill has crossed a major moral line,” he said. “More and more parents in our state are coming to the realization that we do not need state-run schools to educate our children.”
More than 6,000 people signed in online regarding the bill: 1,203 signed in “pro,” while 4,951 signed in “con.”
Following the hearing, Rep. Matt Marshall, R-Eatonville, told The Center Square bringing up title issues with ESSB 5181 is now on the record and that Republicans are confident that if it becomes law, it would not hold up in court as I-2081 is existing law.
This report was first published by The Center Square Washington.
Also read:
- Opinion: Were Republican voters just sleeping during the August primary election?
CCRP Chairman Matt Bumala says 60% of primary no-shows in the 17th and 18th districts were Republicans. - Opinion: WA Cares’ launch showcased care WA Cares did not provide
Gov. Ferguson showcased a caregiving arrangement at the WA Cares launch that the program had not paid for a single day of. - Auditor, auditor candidate address scrutiny over job title
Greg Kimsey says roughly 40 county employees hold the deputy county auditor designation Kelly used in his campaign. - Opinion: Is Mitchell Kelly misleading voters with his ‘deputy auditor’ claim?
Clark County HR records show no position called “Deputy County Auditor” has ever existed, Anderson argues. - Opinion: Democrats rig the ballot to save their income tax
Churchill argues the ballot disclosure warning voters of education cuts describes revenue never collected and not yet allocated.
