Initiative 2117, which has been certified for the ballot by the Secretary of State’s Office, would repeal the CCA’s cap and trade carbon auctions
TJ Martinell
The Center Square Washington
An initiative on the November ballot could eliminate almost all of the revenue currently diverted by the state toward electrifying the public and private transportation sector.
According to a Wednesday presentation by the Electric Vehicle Coordinating Council, 84 percent of all funding for zero emission vehicle investments comes from revenue generated by the 2021 Climate Commitment Act.
Initiative 2117, which has been certified for the ballot by the Secretary of State’s Office, would repeal the CCA’s cap and trade carbon auctions that have already generated billions in new revenue. Of that, $671 million has been dedicated to ZEV investments. Critics refer to the carbon auction as a “hidden gas tax,” arguing that it has led to increased gas prices in Washington compared to other states.
If approved by voters, it will represent one more hurdle for state efforts to electrify the transportation sector. Although the council approved a transportation electrification strategy last year, it has already acknowledged that it won’t meet its 2030 emission goals. On top of that, the state will need three million more charging ports to accommodate new EVs on the road. The cost of the ports will depend on the type, with the average cost of installation $300 to $1,500 cost for a single EV port level 1, $6,000 for single EV port level 2, and $10,000-$40,000 for DC fast charging port.
Further, they will also have to contend with the increased load on the electrical grid. Clark County recently announced a program offering $50 credit to EV owners who promise not to charge their vehicles during “peak hours.” Clark County currently has 20 EVs per 1,000 residents. The county with the highest is San Juan, with 50.7 EVs per 1,000 residents, while Garfield County has the lowest at 1.3 per 1,000 residents.
EV charging infrastructure currently makes up 33% of state funding for EV investments. Most of the EV investment spending (61%) is through the Washington State Department of Transportation. Almost half (45%) of the state spending is on EV vehicles to convert the existing public fleet.
While the latest state supplemental budget increased spending by $100 million, $130 million or 19% of approved spending has been delayed in response to I-2117.
While the remaining amount will still be spent regardless of whether voters approve I-2117 in November, state Department of Commerce’s Transportation Electrification Policy Lead Steven Hershkowitz told the Electric Vehicle Coordinating Council at its Wednesday meeting that “would not continue to roll over should that policy go away. It really is a significant chunk … of where ZEV are being funded right now.”
The council’s next meeting is May 1.
This report was first published by The Center Square Washington.
Also read:
- Rep. John Ley’s new bill calls for an independent audit of Interstate 5 Bridge Replacement Project
Rep. John Ley introduced legislation requiring an independent audit of the Interstate 5 Bridge Replacement Project to review costs, management, and oversight. - Letter: Public school vision
Clark County resident Larry Roe urges a deeper community discussion about public school priorities, levy funding, and the long-term affordability of education for local families. - County Charter Review Commission sets meeting schedule, selects officers
The Clark County Charter Review Commission set a weekly meeting schedule beginning Feb. 4 and selected officers as it begins its review of the county charter. - WA Secretary of State certifies parental rights initiative
The Washington Secretary of State certified a parental rights initiative after verifying enough valid signatures, sending the measure to the Legislature and likely placing it on the November 2026 ballot. - WA leaders prepare for possibility of immigration crackdown
Washington’s governor and attorney general outlined preparations for a potential immigration crackdown, including possible conflicts between federal agents and state or local authorities - Opinion: House Bill 1834 would create a regulatory nightmare and restricts parental control on social media
Mark Harmsworth argues that House Bill 1834 would undermine parental authority and create sweeping regulatory and legal risks under the guise of protecting minors online. - Clark College invites high school students & families to learn how Running Start can jump-start college success
Clark College will offer virtual information sessions and in-person support nights to help high school students and families understand the Running Start program and the steps to enroll.
wpDiscuz
