
Expert thinks that the legislative component added by cap-and-trade may be as high as 45 cents per gallon
Timothy Schumann
The Center Square Washington
Three weeks ago, Washington surpassed California as the most expensive fuel market in the nation. That trend held this week as prices hovered close to the $5.00 per gallon mark.
Up nearly 30% in the last six months alone, this is only the third week this year that fuel prices have fallen in the state. The average price of a gallon of regular unleaded was sitting at $4.96 statewide on Monday, down from $4.98 the week prior, according to AAA data. This price drop marks only the 3rd week this year of declining fuel prices for Washingtonians, following the implementation of the new carbon tax earlier this year.
This two-cent per gallon decrease moved opposite the national average, which rose from $3.53 to $3.54 per gallon.
“Gas prices may rise over the next few days based on slightly higher demand,” said AAA spokesperson Andrew Gross in a statement. “But it could be more of a blip than a trend, and demand may retreat once the holiday is further in the rearview mirror.”
While that trend may hold true for the rest of the nation, it can hardly be called a blip in Washington, with fuel prices holding steady around $5.00 per gallon for weeks.
Washington’s $4.96 per gallon is $1.42 per gallon higher than the national average of $3.54. It is also $2.00 per gallon above the nation’s least expensive fuel cost of $2.96 per gallon, currently paid by Mississippi residents.
Intra-state variance remains high at $1.17 per gallon, down five cents per gallon from the week prior. The outliers this week, again San Juan and Asotin counties, represent the most and least expensive gas prices statewide at $5.50 and $4.33 per gallon, respectively.
This price variance still largely follows the Cascade Range, with residents to the west paying a higher premium at the pump than residents to the east.
Some state policy experts think there’s a legislative component to the relatively high cost of Washingtonians’ fuel, as previously reported by The Center Square, citing the state’s new cap-and-trade carbon tax program implemented Jan 1. of this year.
With the second carbon auction completed May 31, and the results announced June 7, one of those experts thinks that the legislative component added by cap-and-trade may be as high as 45 cents per gallon.
“Although Washington is paying more for CO2 emissions than California, that additional cost doesn’t help the environment – it just harms our economy,” said Todd Meyers of the Washington Policy Center in a recent report. “As long as the governor and agency staff continue to deny that reality, Washington residents will pay a high price for energy, but won’t receive the environmental benefits they are paying for.”
One Democrat, Senator Mark Mullet, agrees this price is too high, having recently introduced legislation to cap the price of these auctions.
“Putting a price on carbon pollution is an important part of responding to our climate crisis, but the prices for carbon permits at our auctions have been way too high,” said Mullet in a statement accompanying the announcement of the legislation.
“The whole idea all along has been that our price for a permit for a ton of carbon should line up with California’s – instead we’re nearly double California’s price,” Mullet continued. “I think the Department of Ecology is sort of dropping the ball here, and it’s the people of Washington who are having to pay for it.”
The third carbon auction is set to take place on Aug. 30.
This report was first published by The Center Square Washington.
Also read:
- Opinion: IBR’s evasive, misleading and dishonest excuses for higher costJoe Cortright argues the Interstate Bridge Replacement Program has withheld detailed cost estimates while offering contradictory explanations for rising costs tied to the I-5 Bridge project.
- Rep. David Stuebe sponsors bill to strengthen enforcement of auto insurance laws and protect Washington driversRep. David Stuebe has introduced HB 2308, a bill aimed at strengthening enforcement of Washington’s auto insurance laws and increasing accountability for repeat uninsured drivers.
- Letter: Interstate Bridge Replacement’s Park & Ride insanityBob Ortblad criticizes the Interstate Bridge Replacement Program’s proposed Park & Ride garages, arguing the costs are excessive and unlikely to receive federal funding.
- Letter: Interstate Bridge Replacement $13.6 billion estimate is too low! Bob Ortblad argues the Interstate Bridge Replacement Program’s $13.6 billion cost estimate understates the true expense, citing comparable projects, construction challenges, and engineering assumptions.
- Opinion: ‘The drama and the waste of taxpayer money continues’Rep. John Ley outlines his objections to the approved fixed-span I-5 Bridge design, citing cost concerns, engineering standards, funding uncertainty, and opposition to light rail and tolls.






