Democrats are ending their bid to repeal a voter-approved limit on property tax growth
Jerry Cornfield
Washington State Standard
The property tax battle of 2025 is over in the Washington state Legislature.
Democrats are ending their bid to repeal a voter-approved limit on property tax growth, excising one of the most controversial revenue-raising ideas they’ve pursued this session.
The proposal, embedded in House Bill 2049, seeks to allow an increase in the growth factor from the current 1% cap to the combined rate of population growth plus inflation within a taxing district, not to exceed 3%. This would apply to the state’s common schools levy and for cities and counties, as well as special purpose districts.
A fiscal analysis projected that uncapping the state property tax would net an additional $200 million for public schools and potentially $236 million for local governments in the next budget. The bill passed the House Finance Committee on Saturday and is expected to be voted on by the House today.
But Rep. Steve Bergquist, D-Renton, the bill’s sponsor, filed an amendment Sunday to remove sections on the growth limit, effectively ending Democrats’ pursuit of the change.
“It’s my understanding we don’t have a three-corners agreement on those provisions,” Bergquist said Monday morning.
Three-corners refers to the Democratic leadership of the House, Senate and Democratic Gov. Bob Ferguson.
Ferguson declined to discuss the conversations but said shelving the property tax plan was the correct move.
“We have to look at a lot of revenue sources, and I think we need to minimize the impacts on working people in the state,” he said Monday morning. “So I think they made the right decision.”
Without the property tax change, the bill will be focused on education funding and providing school districts with the ability to collect more revenue from voter-approved local levies.
From the outset of the session — now just six days from ending — Democrats’ desire to increase the limit has been fiercely opposed by Republican lawmakers and others who warned the measure would drive up living and housing costs.
A year ago, Senate Democrats pushed to erase the cap solely for cities and counties. It too ran into a buzzsaw of opposition, forcing the majority party to set it down.
This report was first published by The Washington State Standard.
Also read:
- Third Congressional District candidates agree to two televised October debates
John Braun accepted two televised debates with Rep. Marie Gluesenkamp Perez, set for October 7 on KOIN and October 13 on KATU. - Charter Review Commission schedules town hall meetings to discuss proposed amendments on the November ballot
Clark County Charter Review Commission will hold five district town halls to discuss nine proposed ballot amendments. - Washington Rep. John Ley warns ballooning bridge budget needs reality check
Rep. John Ley says the IBR ballooned from a $44M contract to a $13B–$15B project, with phase one still $2.2B short. - POLL: The IBR project is described as only 30% designed and 30% funded after more than six years of work. How confident are you in the current management of the IBR program?
IBR’s cost has climbed from $3.2–$4.8B to $15.2B while the project remains 30% designed and 30% funded. - New Clark County Poll: Pocketbook issues and taxes top voter concerns
A poll of 400 Clark County voters finds 74% say rising costs are more of a concern than a year ago.
wpDiscuz
