The court plans to conduct a ‘trial on paper’ to determine whether or not the fines imposed on him were too excessive under state law
TJ Martinell
The Center Square Washington
More than three years ago, tax protester and initiative sponsor Tim Eyman was fined millions of dollars stemming from Public Disclosure Commission campaign finance violations in 2012.
Now, a court plans to conduct a “trial on paper” to determine whether or not the fines imposed on him were too excessive under state law.
The Washington State Constitution’s Article 1, Section 14 contains a provision that protects individuals from receiving fines considered excessive for several reasons, including too “severe” for the offense committed or regarded as so burdensome it denies them the ability to obtain basic needs. Additionally, the fines must take into account the individual’s ability to pay it.
In his request for remand, Eyman’s legal counsel Richard Saunders, a former State Supreme Court justice, argued that it even if no interest was accrued on the $8 million he owes in fines and attorneys fees, it would take him 67 years to pay it off if he made $10,000 monthly contributions.
“If that does not demonstrate Mr. Eyman’s lack of ability to pay, your undersigned cannot imagine what would,” the court document states.
The request for remand instead proposes that the court “set the penalty at an amount commensurate with Mr. Eyman’s current financial circumstances.” Eyman, who declared bankruptcy in 2018, produced tax and financial documents demonstrating that he has been “left impoverished and almost destitute.”
The Court of Appeals handed the case to Thurston County Superior Court. At Friday’s hearing, Judge Chris Lanese noted that he would only be looking at the issue of whether or not Eyman was capable of paying the fines based on his financial circumstances at the time they were imposed, rather than his current financial situation. As part of the “trial on paper,” Lanese will examine affidavits and other exhibits submitted by both parties.
This report was first published by The Center Square Washington.
Also read:
- C-TRAN board member regrets vote that could leave Clark County taxpayers on the hook for light rail
C-TRAN board member Tim Hein says he regrets a 2023 vote that could commit Clark County to funding light rail O&M. He’s now urging the board to reverse course and protect taxpayers. - Social media activity of Clark County public defender questioned
Public Defender Renee Alsept’s anti-Trump social media posts have sparked concern from citizens and former officials, but Clark County says personal accounts aren’t covered by policy. - Opinion: ‘Vilifying broad swaths of Americans’Editor Ken Vance reflects on troubling posts by public defender Renee Alsept and shares a thoughtful perspective from longtime attorney Brad Andersen on ethics, discourse, and professionalism.
- POLL: Should the county update its Human Resources policy to include personal social media accounts of employees in sensitive roles?This week’s Clark County Today poll asks whether the county should update its Human Resources policy to include personal social media accounts of employees in sensitive roles, following concerns over online conduct.
- Project 42 launches its third county project in Clark County with Leslie Lewallen as directorProject 42 has launched its Clark County initiative with Camas Council member Leslie Lewallen as director, aiming to boost civic engagement and local government accountability.
- Paddle Safe Week begins July 22, teaches importance of water safetyPaddle Safe Week runs July 22–28 and highlights water safety practices for paddlers across Washington, including life jacket use and cold water shock prevention.
- Council for the Homeless releases 2025 Point-in-Time Count for Clark CountyThe 2025 Point-in-Time Count found increases in sheltered seniors and unsheltered individuals across Clark County, with CFTH emphasizing the need for long-term housing solutions.
