Rep. Jim Walsh states: ‘This urgent election integrity issue needs to be fixed now’
TJ Martinell
The Center Square Washington
Washington GOP Chair and State Rep. Jim Walsh, R-Aberdeen, has filed a federal lawsuit alongside Franklin County Auditor Matt Beaton against a consent decree agreed to by the Secretary of State’s Office that overturned a 30-day voter residency requirement in place since the state constitution was ratified in 1889.
Announcing the lawsuit filed in U.S. Federal Court of Western Washington, Walsh wrote on X, formerly known as Twitter, that he did so to “reverse a shady scheme to destroy the State Constitution’s rule that a person be a WA resident for 30 days before registering to vote. This urgent election integrity issue needs to be fixed now.”
The Center Square first broke news of the consent decree in June, just days before SOS codified the removal of the residency requirement through election rulemaking, though the provision is still found in the state constitution. The lawsuit filed last year by the Washington Alliance for Retired Americans against the residency requirement argued that it violated federal law, in which no residency requirements can be imposed on federal elections.
However, the consent decree agreed to by the State Attorney General’s Office on behalf of SOS made it apply also to state elections. The decree was signed the last day of the legislative session; a provision in the consent decree would have allowed the Legislature to reinstate the residency requirement through lawmaking and have it apply to this November election if done so by Aug. 1.
In their lawsuit, Walsh and Beaton claim that the plaintiffs acted as a “tool for a partisan elections lawyer to roam the country voiding laws he perceives as detriment to the electoral prospects of candidates he favors. And the state defendants were wrong to concede without raising any of the plain challenges.”
It further argues that the plaintiffs “lacks standing, and because the case plainly lacked genuine adversity, this Court did and still does lack Article III jurisdiction over the matter. The Alliance failed to identity any specific current member presently or imminently injured in fact by either the state or precinct aspects of this qualification law.”
The Center Square reached out to the SOS and AGO for comment, but did not receive a reply by the time of publication.
This report was first published by The Center Square Washington.
Also read:
- These new laws and taxes take effect in Washington state on Jan. 1
Several new laws and tax increases passed in 2025 take effect Jan. 1 in Washington, impacting unemployment benefits, business taxes, transportation fees, consumer costs and regulatory requirements. - Opinion: Justice for none – Court hands down a mandate without a dime to fund it
Nancy Churchill argues that a Washington Supreme Court ruling on public defense imposes costly mandates on local governments without providing funding to implement them. - Deportations, tariffs, court clashes, record shutdown mark a historic year in Washington, D.C.
A year marked by deportations, tariffs, court battles, and a record federal shutdown reshaped Washington, D.C., during President Donald Trump’s return to office. - Opinion: The progressive attack on Washington’s sheriffs
Nancy Churchill argues that proposed legislation would shift power over county sheriffs away from voters and concentrate control within state government. - VIDEO: WA GOP budget lead blasts Ferguson’s fiscal plan as ‘a complete joke’
Republican lawmakers sharply criticized Gov. Bob Ferguson’s proposed 2026 supplemental budget, arguing it fails to meet Washington’s four-year balanced budget requirement and masks deeper fiscal problems.
