
Washington State Republican Party provides a response to US Supreme Court ruling in favor of presidential immunity
Monday’s 6-3 SCOTUS decision in the Trump v. United States case is a win for the rule of law according to the Washington State Republican Party (WAGOP) and for Donald Trump. A WAGOP statement indicates it’s a serious blow to left-wing attempts to weaponize the court system. So, it’s a win for all Americans.

But WAGOP officials believe the hysterical overreaction to the decision among left-wing partisans is a potential risk to civil order.
Technically, the decision resolves recent questions about how “presidential immunity” works in our law. The Supreme Court states that legal immunity does exist for “official” actions of a president. But not for “unofficial” actions. A president’s actions are presumed to have immunity from lawsuits, but that presumption can be overcome — and a lawsuit against a president can go forward — if an action is shown to be “unofficial.”
This distinction helps Trump as several of the most controversial allegations made against him involve actions he took in his official capacity.
There are other aspects of today’s decision that are worth noting. In his concurring opinion, Justice Clarence Thomas points out that an entity prosecuting a president must have proper Constitutional authority from the people to do so. This will likely limit the ability of “special prosecutors” and other mechanisms not clearly described in our Constitution.
Some critics of today’s decision will complain that the Supreme Court has “punted” in this decision, by leaving the distinction between “official” and “unofficial” actions to other courts. This criticism is rational and worth considering. But setting that determination as a preliminary step in any action against a president is consistent with Constitutional separation of powers and limits on government overreach.
Other criticisms of the decision are, frankly, less rational. Some partisans who revile Trump have been quick to jump to hysterical conclusions. A Joe Biden campaign staffer shrieked to the media that the Supreme Court “has just handed Donald Trump the keys to dictatorship.”
Of course, that is not true.
Other hysterics associated with the Biden campaign attacked the Supreme Court as “conflicted and compromised.” This overheated rhetoric is dangerous and a potential threat to civil order. Normal people should remain vigilant—such hyperbolic responses could encourage violent behavior among unstable political extremists.
Still, today, the rule of law won.
In the meantime, Trump’s presidential reelection campaign continues to gain political momentum. Trump campaign staffer Jason Miller (a Washington native) recently told a Seattle-based media outlet that “Washington state may now be in play” for Trump in 2024. Today’s Supreme Court decision adds to that momentum.
Also read:
- Rep. John Ley’s new bill calls for an independent audit of Interstate 5 Bridge Replacement ProjectRep. John Ley introduced legislation requiring an independent audit of the Interstate 5 Bridge Replacement Project to review costs, management, and oversight.
- Letter: Public school visionClark County resident Larry Roe urges a deeper community discussion about public school priorities, levy funding, and the long-term affordability of education for local families.
- County Charter Review Commission sets meeting schedule, selects officersThe Clark County Charter Review Commission set a weekly meeting schedule beginning Feb. 4 and selected officers as it begins its review of the county charter.
- WA Secretary of State certifies parental rights initiativeThe Washington Secretary of State certified a parental rights initiative after verifying enough valid signatures, sending the measure to the Legislature and likely placing it on the November 2026 ballot.
- WA leaders prepare for possibility of immigration crackdownWashington’s governor and attorney general outlined preparations for a potential immigration crackdown, including possible conflicts between federal agents and state or local authorities
- Opinion: House Bill 1834 would create a regulatory nightmare and restricts parental control on social mediaMark Harmsworth argues that House Bill 1834 would undermine parental authority and create sweeping regulatory and legal risks under the guise of protecting minors online.
- Clark College invites high school students & families to learn how Running Start can jump-start college successClark College will offer virtual information sessions and in-person support nights to help high school students and families understand the Running Start program and the steps to enroll.








