
The DOJ says it intends to use the information to look for voter ineligibility
Carleen Johnson
The Center Square Washington
Washington Secretary of State Steve Hobbs has no intention of complying with a U.S. Department of Justice request for information from the state’s voter registration list.
On Sept. 8, the DOJ sent a letter to Hobbs requesting a copy of the state’s voter registration database within 14 days. The request included sensitive personal data for each registered voter: full name, date of birth, residential address, driver’s license number, or the last four digits of their Social Security number.
The DOJ says it intends to use the information to look for voter ineligibility.
“The information the DOJ is requesting is protected under RCW 29A.08.710 and not subject to disclosure,” SOS Director of External Affairs Charlie Boisner emailed The Center Square on Thursday. “Washington voters expect and trust us to protect their personal information, and releasing it without clear legal justification would undermine that trust.”
In May, the DOJ began sending requests to several states for copies of voter registration databases. The department cited authority under the National Voter Registration Act and the Help America Vote Act.
Some states have cooperated, but several states – including Maine, Oregon, and now Washington – have refused the request, citing privacy concerns and contending the government has no legal basis for it.
“The letter does not indicate that the information would be used to identify criminals or illegal immigrants,” Boisner continued. “Secretary Hobbs is concerned this request represents an overreach by the federal government into Washington’s independent management of its voter database.”
State law, he said, means processes and systems are already in place – RCW 29A.08.125 (5), (7d), and (10) – to verify a person’s eligibility to vote in Washington.
“The Office of the Secretary of State has no authority over immigration enforcement or criminal investigation, so using the information of legally registered voters for those purposes is not within the scope of this office,” Boisner noted.
Washington State Republican Party Chair Jim Walsh pointed out the supremacy of federal law over state law.
“Is this a joke? State law does not supersede federal law. Article 1, Section 2, of the Washington State Constitution recognizes the U.S. Constitution as the ‘supreme law of the land.’ By extension, federal statutory law takes precedence over state law when there’s a conflict,” Walsh emailed The Center Square.
Walsh, who also serves in the state House of Representatives, is behind an initiative campaign to require Washington residents to prove they are U.S. citizens before receiving an election ballot.
Under the proposed measure, a prospective voter must show an enhanced driver’s license or present another form of identification, like a passport or birth certificate, at a county auditor’s office when they first register. Those already registered to vote would have their registration canceled if they don’t supply such proof by the November 2027 election. That’s when the changes would take effect.
Boisner said his office is aware of the DOJ’s litigation against states that aren’t complying.
“The DOJ recently publicized its plans for litigation against Oregon and Maine secretaries of state for not turning over all the information they requested, so the threat of litigation against Washington is real. We are assessing our options and reviewing the legal basis for the request, as Secretary Hobbs has the utmost respect for the rule of law,” Boisner said. “However, a letter of request from the DOJ is not itself law, and any action we take must be grounded in clear legal authority. Secretary Hobbs is committed to protecting the privacy of Washington voters and upholding the trust they place in us to safeguard their personal information.”
Walsh floated another possibility.
“Speaking hypothetically, if a whistleblower in the state government has already provided the U.S. Department of Justice with Washington’s voter registration data, [DOJ’s] lawful request might be a test of Hobbs’ effectiveness and transparency,” he said. “Will he pass?”
This report was first published by The Center Square Washington.
Also read:
- County pays $7.5 million to widow of VPD Officer Donald SahotaClark County has agreed to pay $7.5 million to the widow of Vancouver Police Officer Donald Sahota to resolve a negligence lawsuit following the 2022 incident where a sheriff’s deputy mistakenly shot the off-duty officer during a confrontation with a robbery suspect.
- Opinion: Brandi Kruse and I are feeling discouraged but we’re planning to continue advocating for political change. Will you?Clark County Today Editor Ken Vance reflects on a discouraging week in Washington state politics, echoing Brandi Kruse’s frustrations over Democrats’ state income tax victory and local decisions on transit and ICE while urging conservatives not to give up on advocating for political change.
- OII passes 60-day point in Vancouver Police Department use of deadly force investigationThe Washington State Office of Independent Investigations is just past 60 days into its investigation of a Vancouver Police Department use of deadly force involving officers Sean Donaldson and Christopher Holmquist and the death of 44-year-old Perry J. Sellars after a late-night disturbance call on NE 46th Street.
- Opinion: ‘My thoughts on yesterday’s tragic state income tax’Leslie Lewallen argues Democrats passed an unconstitutional “millionaires tax” on March 10, 2026, rejected more than 70 Republican amendments, and set Washington on a path she says will harm jobs, schools, and families statewide.
- Opinion: Starbucks founder flees the new NW tax hellLars Larson argues that Howard and Sheri Schultz are leaving the Pacific Northwest for Miami following Washington’s new millionaires tax and rapid state budget growth in Oregon and Washington.
- After marathon debate, WA House advances income taxThe Washington House approved a proposed income tax on households earning more than $1 million a year after more than 24 hours of debate and dozens of amendments.
- C-TRAN: Light rail funding addressed again; changes are coming to C-TRAN board compositionC-TRAN approved new language tied to the Interstate Bridge Replacement Program that shields smaller cities from light rail operating costs while shifting potential financial responsibility toward Vancouver and the urban growth area.








