State of Colorado forces Christians to violate their faith in the name of ‘nondiscrimination’
Bob Unruh
WND News Center
The U.S. Supreme Court is to hear arguments on Monday in a critical free speech case.
The question is whether a state – the leftist Colorado in this case – can deliberately order a Christian to violate her faith in the name of its so-called “nondiscrimination” agenda.
The fight is over a Denver website developer who has been ordered by the state, under penalty of law, to promote same-sex marriages through her work if she does any work at all for traditional weddings.
Multiple groups have filed friend-of-the-court briefs, including Liberty Counsel, when the attack by the all-Democrat government in the state against web designer Lorie Smith developed.
The case is 303 Creative v. Elenis.
It’s just the latest attack from the state of Colorado on Christians. Years ago it was soundly rebuked by the Supreme Court for its attack on Masterpiece Cakeshop’s Jack Phillips.
There, the state had ordered him into an indoctrination program for his refusal to use his artistry to create a “wedding cake” for a same-sex duo.
The legal team explained the current issue: “Smith creates unique and beautiful websites for her clients and started her business in 2012 to exercise creative freedom. Smith serves everyone but cannot use her design skills and creativity to express messages that violate her deeply held religious beliefs. However, under Colorado’s Anti-Discrimination Act, Smith could be punished simply for offering to create websites only celebrating weddings consistent with her beliefs that marriage is between one man and one woman.”
Further, the state even imposes a gag order, preventing Smith from expressing on her website why she cannot create messages celebrating “certain ideas.”
As was revealed during the Masterpiece case, the state’s public accommodations law was written with a deliberate bias against people of faith, as it “allows secular artists but not religious ones like Smith to make ‘message-based refusals.’”
”Liberty Counsel presents the fact that artistic expression is pure speech that is fully protected by the First Amendment and must be protected from censorship or compulsion, particularly when the message is an unpopular one. This applies even when speakers are compensated for artistic expression. The protected artistic expression includes, among other things, books, plays, films, video games, music, painting, poetry, drawings, engravings, sculptures and photography. This also includes website creation and content as pure speech since websites can provide a powerful way for private citizens to make their voices heard,” the organization noted.
In the past, the high court has noted the First Amendment draws no distinction between the creation, distribution, or consumption of the speech at hand.
”For example, in Fields v. City of Philadelphia, the High Court ruled that ‘the First Amendment protects actual photos, videos, and recordings, and for this protection to have meaning the Amendment must also protect the act of creating that material.’”
Kristen Waggoner of the Alliance Defending Freedom will argue before the U.S. Supreme Court on Smith’s behalf.
Also read:
- POLL: Are you inclined to vote to approve the three remaining Washington initiatives?Are you inclined to vote to approve the three remaining Washington initiatives?
- Washougal Mayor David Stuebe announces candidacy for state representativeWashougal Mayor David Stuebe has officially declared his candidacy for the position of state representative to succeed Paul Harris in the 17th Legislative District.
- High school sports: Union’s Mitch Ratigan is way ahead of his timeA multi-sport athlete for the Union Titans, senior Mitch Ratigan is back on the baseball field five months after reconstructive knee surgery, celebrating the fact that he and his parents opted for a procedure that allowed for a fast recovery.
- CCFR: Revenue is not keeping up with service demands and costs to provide emergency servicesRevenue from Clark-Cowlitz Fire Rescue’s fire levy is not keeping up with capital needs, increasing numbers of emergency incidents, and costs to provide service, the agency reports.
- Opinion: Where did the data come from for Ridgefield School District?Ridgefield resident Heidi Pozzo provides sources for the information she has shared in her series of columns on the Ridgefield School District bond proposal before voters in the April 23 special election.
- Firmly Planted Action to host town hall with gubernatorial candidate Dave ReichertFirmly Planted Action will host a town hall meeting with Washington gubernatorial candidate Dave Reichert on Mon., April 29.
- Public Disclosure Commission gets back on the road, this time to VancouverThe Washington State Public Disclosure Commission is meeting in Vancouver on Wednesday, April 24, as part of its commitment to hear directly from voters and members of the regulated community alike about how to improve public understanding of money in politics.