
Lawmaker states that while the bill establishes drug possession as a gross misdemeanor, it creates opportunities for violators to ‘game the system’ without punishment or undergoing treatment
Rep. Peter Abbarno released the following statement after Senate Bill 5536 – a flawed effort to address the state’s drug possession laws – failed to pass the House on the final day of the 2023 legislative session:
“Senate Bill 5536 takes the very policies that have failed to address substance abuse on the local level and expands those failed policies statewide. It will lead to more substance abuse, more homelessness, more preventable tragedies, and less local control. If the majority party were serious about addressing this crisis, they would work with us, on a bipartisan basis, and pass legislation that effectively helps people recover from addiction. Sadly, this bill will do the opposite.”
While the bill establishes drug possession as a gross misdemeanor, it creates opportunities for violators to “game the system” without punishment or undergoing treatment. The measure would also prevent local governments from restricting the distribution of dangerous drug paraphernalia; house recovering addicts with active drug users; establish “safe” injection sites open to all ages, including children; and eliminate the public notice requirement for siting opioid treatment facilities.
For these reasons, House Republicans were unanimous in their opposition to the bill and were joined by 14 House Democrats. A tentative, bipartisan agreement was struck the day prior, but House Democrats offered only a partisan conference report to vote on as the House approached the final hours of session.
“Drug abuse, addiction, and the rise in crime are serious issues in communities across Washington state,” added Abbarno, R-Centralia. “The proposal brought forth by House Democrats did not represent my values, the values of my community, or the values of the state of Washington. We are committed to working on a real solution that protects our communities and serves the most marginalized and those struggling with addition. That might require a special session and we will have to wait.”
Background: In Feb. 2021, the state Supreme Court ruled in State v. Blake, that Washington’s felony drug-possession statute was unconstitutional because it criminalized possession even when a person did not knowingly have drugs.
Two months later, the Legislature passed Senate Bill 5476, a temporary measure reducing the penalty for possessing illegal drugs like fentanyl, heroin, and methamphetamine from a felony to a misdemeanor, which is set to expire on July 1, 2023. Unless the Legislature acts in time, there will be no statewide criminal penalty for possession of these drugs. Local governments could, however, adopt their own criminal penalties.
Information provided by Washington State House Republicans,
houserepublicans.wa.gov
Also read:
- Opinion: Supreme Court Position 1 – Fox in the henhouseMelody’s ties to the income tax strategy meeting and $175,519 in fundraising raise independence questions.
- City of Vancouver issues temporary ban on all recreational burningVancouver Fire Marshal Heidi Scarpelli’s ban covers campfires, bonfires, and outdoor fire pits through summer and fall.
- Planters Days celebrates Woodland with patriotic themeWoodland’s 104th Planters Days runs June 18–21 with a parade, frog jump, bed races, coronation, and fireworks.
- Opinion: Trading one bad healthcare system for another is not a solutionWashington Policy Center’s Elizabeth New (Hovde) argues the state’s Universal Health Care Commission ignores free-market alternatives entirely.
- Two Rivers Heritage Museum launches first membership drive in decadesTwo Rivers Heritage Museum is launching its first membership drive in decades, aiming for 250 members during America250.
- Storm Nation Foundation awards $18,000 to Skyview seniorsStorm Nation Foundation has awarded $110,000 in total scholarships since its founding, supporting Skyview seniors each year.
- Opinion: What is the Declaration of Independence?Rob Natelson breaks down the Declaration’s five-part structure and its role as legal announcement, not lawmaker.








