Section 106 ensures that important historic and cultural places are considered when a federally funded project is planned
The IBR Program is holding an online open house and public comment period from May 9 to June 8, 2025 as part of Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA).
Section 106 ensures that important historic and cultural places are considered when a federally funded project is planned. The IBR Program is following this law to help protect these places as we get ready for construction of the Modified LPA and plan the future of our region.
During the public comment period, the Program wants your input on the Draft Programmatic Agreement (PA).
This Draft PA arranges how the IBR Program will follow Section 106 and includes ideas for how to reduce or make up for any harm to historic places previously identified within the Program’s “Area of Potential Effects.”
It includes mitigation strategies for “Adverse Effects” — impacts to historic places which can’t be avoided — that outline potential ways to protect and share important history with the public. They are based on the project’s impacts and the needs of the local community.
Examples of mitigation may include:
- Moving, reusing, or fixing up historic buildings or features
- Taking photos or making drawings before buildings are changed or removed
- Creating educational materials like websites, signs, curriculum, public art or tours
- Studying and recording archaeological sites
The IBR Program wants to hear from you! The public comment period will be open until June 8, 2025. You can learn more about the Section 106 process and participate in the comment period here.
Also read:
- With more state financial stress on horizon, Ferguson signs WA budget
Washington’s latest $79.4 billion state budget taps rainy day funds, reduces child care provider payments, and defers big tax collections, setting up a deficit in 2028. - Gov. Ferguson signs controversial law tightening standards for WA sheriffs
Sheriffs must now meet strict standards or risk removal, with local officials appointing replacements instead of voter recall, amid ongoing debate over constitutionality. - Opinion: Stalin would be proud – Clark County Socialists gathered for ‘No Kings’
Reform Clark County’s Rob Anderson criticizes local and national groups for organizing protests that featured Auditor Greg Kimsey as a keynote, raising concerns about public trust and political partisanship. - Higher payroll taxes may hit workers as eligibility rules broaden
Elizabeth New argues the state’s paid family leave system drains paychecks from lower-income workers and gives more to frequent and high-income users, urging repeal or major reform. - Clark County Sheriff’s Office completes extradition in homicide case
Dariel Nunez-Montero was transferred from Kentucky to the Clark County Jail and is being held as the investigation into the death of Courtney Clinton moves forward. - Letter: Vancouver Mayor Anne McEnerny-Ogle makes several serious and incorrect engineering statements
Bob Ortblad critiques engineering claims by Vancouver Mayor Anne McEnerny-Ogle, highlighting cost and safety advantages of an immersed tunnel for the I-5 crossing. - Opinion: The beginning of the end of anchor babies
Lars Larson argues the Constitution excludes children born to non-legal residents, as the Supreme Court debates birthright citizenship and public opinion data shows limited support.
wpDiscuz
