Calls justices ‘extremist’ for adhering to U.S. Constitution
Bob Unruh
WND News Center
The U.S. Supreme Court is “extremist” for not allowing various government officials to simply overturn the U.S. Constitution’s Second Amendment and ban guns, or carrying guns, whenever they want.
That is the verdict from Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., who is most popularly known for falsely claiming for years to be Native American, when she isn’t.
According to a report at Breitbart, her comments arose because of an attempt by New Mexico Gov. Michelle Grisham to cancel the state’s gun laws and ban carrying a weapon in Albuquerque and Bernalillo County.
Many experts have described Grisham’s attempted action as simply unconstitutional and even the state’s attorney general announced that office would not defend Grisham’s political move.
In fact, across America, some of the highest gun crime rates are in cities and locales where the gun laws are the tightest.
Breitbart reported on “CNN Primetime” that show host Abby Phillip asked Warren, “New Mexico’s governor, Michelle Lujan Grisham, a Democrat, she’s issued this temporary order that bans both open and concealed carry of firearms in Albuquerque and in the surrounding county. Do you believe that that is the right move? Do you think it’s even legal?”
Warren refused to answer directly, launching into a long political statement:
I want to put it this way: I think that our mayors and our governors have the hardest job in the world right now when it comes to gun violence. Keep in mind, for example, in the District of Columbia, a few years back, D.C. said, we just want to basically ban carrying guns, and good for D.C. They said it was going to bring down gun violence, and they were right. And then, an extremist United States Supreme Court said, nope, we’re not going to let you do it, and then Congress wouldn’t act to try to give them some of the tools to help fight gun violence. And yet, it’s those same governors and those same mayors who are then held responsible for the rise in violence. So, I say this, is they’re caught in the switches, and they’re doing everything they possibly can to reduce gun violence and to try to save the lives of our children, our neighbors, everyone.”
Grisham claimed the power to abrogate the Constitution because, in her opinion, there was a “public health emergency.”
Also read:
- Opinion: ‘Predators and progressives’Nancy Churchill attempts to answer why progressives protect predators
- Letter: ‘Nice to have a trustworthy publication’Brad Andersen suggests that “allowing some of the stories to play out a little more slowly may help return some old fashioned integrity in the newsmakers.’’
- Dr. Brian Scott: A lion leader recognized with high honorsThe Camas Lions Club recently announced Dr. Brian Scott as Lion of the Month for April 2024.
- Columbia River spring Chinook fishery above Bonneville Dam to close April 30With the fishery expected to have already met its allowable catch, recreational spring Chinook fishing on the Columbia River mainstem from Bonneville Dam to the Oregon/Washington border will close beginning Tuesday.
- Clark-Cowlitz Fire Rescue to hold ‘push-in’ Ceremony for new ambulanceClark-Cowlitz Fire Rescue will perform a traditional “push-in” ceremony for its new ambulance on May 1, at 10 a.m. at the Ridgefield Fire Station located at 911 N. 65th Avenue in Ridgefield.
- A week after raucous WA GOP convention, gubernatorial candidates share thoughtsThere were dramatically different takes from the two Republican candidates for governor on how last weekend’s state party convention in Spokane went down.
- Opinion: As more states enact learning choice programs that benefit children, nearly one million families have applied to participateLiv Finne of the Washington Policy Center reports that an exciting opportunity has emerged from the damage inflicted on students from the extended COVID public school shutdowns and school curriculum controversies.