The proposed levies aim to provide critical funding for educational programs, operations, facilities, and technology for the district
At its regular meeting on Tuesday (Dec. 10), the Ridgefield School District Board of Directors voted unanimously to place two levy measures on the Feb. 11, 2025, special election ballot. The proposed levies — a replacement Educational Programs and Operations (EP&O) levy and a Capital Facilities and Technology levy — aim to provide critical funding for educational programs, operations, facilities, and technology for the district.
“On behalf of Ridgefield School District, I want to thank our community for their continued engagement and support of our schools,” said Superintendent Dr. Jenny Rodriquez. “The feedback we’ve received has been invaluable in shaping these proposals. We are deeply grateful for the collaboration and trust of our community as we work together to support our students and staff.”
Replacement Educational Programs and Operations (EP&O) Levy
The first measure, Proposition 12, is a replacement of the district’s current EP&O levy, which was approved by voters in August 2022 and expires at the end of 2025. Local levy dollars bridge the gap between state funding and the actual costs of educating Ridgefield’s students, accounting for approximately 13.7% of the district’s total annual budget in 2023-24.
If approved, the three-year replacement levy is estimated to collect a total of $44 million from 2026 to 2028, with an estimated tax rate of $1.75 per $1,000 of assessed property value. Levy dollars provide funding that impacts students in every school in the district. Ridgefield’s EP&O levy funds programs including athletics, student clubs and activities, Cispus Outdoor School, the Family Resource Center, school supplies, early learning services, Special Education services, staff professional development, enhanced curriculum and courses, technology, and more.
Capital Facilities and Technology Levy
The second measure, Proposition 13, is a new Capital Facilities and Technology levy designed to address Ridgefield’s growing needs. If approved, the levy would collect a total of $21.2 million from 2026 to 2028, at an estimated rate of $0.84 per $1,000 of assessed property value. The funding—combined with the use of existing development impact fees and state matching funds—would construct a new elementary school and complete overdue deferred maintenance projects at South Ridge and Union Ridge elementary schools. Additionally, this funding would restore the district’s $500,000 annual technology budget that was cut due to budget constraints.
“The board deeply values the community’s input on these levies,” said Board President Brett Jones. “We’ve listened to your thoughts, ideas, and concerns, and made adjustments to ensure these proposals reflect the desire of our community and meet the needs of our students, families, and staff. Your voice matters, and we are committed to transparent and responsible planning for the future of Ridgefield schools.”
A Continued Low Tax Rate for Ridgefield Residents
Ridgefield’s current total school tax rate of $2.66 per $1,000 of assessed property value is the second-lowest in Clark County. Even with the proposed levies, the district aims to maintain a competitive tax rate while meeting its growing operational and facility needs.
For more information about the replacement EP&O levy and the proposed Capital Facilities and Technology levy, visit the district’s website at www.ridgefieldsd.org.
Information provided by the Ridgefield School District.
Also read:
- Opinion: 2026 Washington Poll: Voters want economic focus, spending restraint, and ed transparency
Results from the first Washington Poll show voters prioritizing the economy, spending restraint, and school transparency, with broad support for education reforms and concern over housing affordability. - What WA Gov. Bob Ferguson said, and left unsaid, in his State of the State address
Gov. Bob Ferguson’s State of the State address emphasized flood recovery, taxes on millionaires, and immigration enforcement while avoiding direct discussion of the state’s looming budget shortfall. - Opinion: House Bill 2481 will stifle innovation and hurt businesses
Mark Harmsworth argues that House Bill 2481 would restrict market-driven pricing, increase regulatory burdens, and ultimately harm Washington businesses and consumers. - Vancouver Fire Department mourns the off-duty passing of firefighter paramedic Jeremiah Frenz
The Vancouver Fire Department announced the off-duty death of Firefighter Paramedic Jeremiah Frenz, who served the community from Fire Station 5 and joined the department in 2020. - C-TRAN Board makes thought-provoking choice for vice chair, voting Wil Fuentes
The C-TRAN Board of Directors voted Wil Fuentes as vice chair for 2026, a move questioned by former board member Michelle Belkot amid ongoing litigation over her removal. - Opinion: Kindness is always welcome, even in places where one does not always find it
Paul Valencia reflects on how a brief moment of kindness between a journalist and a football coach underscores the importance of respect in journalism and public life. - Opinion: Crossing the mighty Columbia River is getting mighty expensive
An opinion column argues lawmakers must reassess the I-5 Columbia River Bridge replacement after revised estimates show the project’s probable cost has more than doubled.
