House Bill 2143 would repeal the provision allowing WSDOT to withhold funding when board membership is not allocated strictly by population
Rep. John Ley has introduced legislation aimed at resolving an ongoing dispute between the city of Vancouver and smaller Clark County cities over representation on the C-TRAN Board of Directors.
The conflict stems from a state requirement that transit agency boards be allocated proportionally by population, or risk having funding withheld by the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT). State law also prohibits any single city from holding more than half of a board’s seats to prevent one jurisdiction from dominating decision-making.
“For most of C-TRAN’s history, the Board’s power was evenly divided, with three seats each for the small cities, Clark County, and the City of Vancouver,” said Ley, R-Vancouver. “That structure ensured smaller cities had an equal voice at the table.”
“However, recent changes to this balance have disrupted the community. That could force residents of smaller cities to help fund a light rail extension tied to the Interstate Bridge Replacement Program, which would primarily benefit a small number of people in downtown Vancouver.”
House Bill 2143 would repeal the provision allowing WSDOT to withhold funding when board membership is not allocated strictly by population. The bill would also cap representation for Clark County and the City of Vancouver at three seats each, preserving seats for smaller cities rather than assigning them solely by population.
“The elected leaders of our small cities have taken a firm stand on this issue at the C-TRAN Board level,” noted Ley. “My bill would protect their voice, ensuring those small communities are heard, and their influence remains at a level that has served the community well for nearly 40 years.”
The 2026 legislative session begins on Monday, Jan. 12.
Information provided by the Washington State House Republicans, houserepublicans.wa.gov
Also read:
- Letter: Interstate Bridge Replacement $13.6 billion estimate is too low!
Bob Ortblad argues the Interstate Bridge Replacement Program’s $13.6 billion cost estimate understates the true expense, citing comparable projects, construction challenges, and engineering assumptions. - Opinion: ‘The drama and the waste of taxpayer money continues’
Rep. John Ley outlines his objections to the approved fixed-span I-5 Bridge design, citing cost concerns, engineering standards, funding uncertainty, and opposition to light rail and tolls. - Coast Guard approves fixed-span design for new Interstate Bridge
The U.S. Coast Guard has approved a fixed-span design for the new Interstate Bridge, clearing a major hurdle for the Interstate Bridge Replacement project. - Opinion: When fast feels slow
Doug Dahl explains why drivers often misjudge their speed, especially when using cruise control or transitioning from freeway to city streets. - Opinion: WSDOT secretary and I ‘obviously have very different definitions for the term cost-effective’
Clark County Today Editor Ken Vance sharply criticizes WSDOT Secretary Julie Meredith’s defense of the Interstate Bridge Replacement project, arguing the escalating cost estimates undermine claims the project is cost-effective.
I won’t hold my breath waiting for the first Democrat-Socialist in Olympia to sign on to this.