Voters adopted strict new restrictions for those trying to purchase a firearm

Bob Unruh
WND News Center
It’s not just lawmakers in America that can do some odd things, like the pending decision in Congress on the oddly named “Respect for Marriage Act” that actually wouldn’t do that.
What it would do is “leave millions of men and women of faith out to dry, as it offers them no meaningful protection from … legal harassment.”
In Oregon this month, it was the voters.
They approved a plan to require people to finish an “approved” in-person firearm safety course, pay a fee, provide personal information, submit to fingerprinting and photographing and pass a federal criminal background check in order to buy a permit – which then could be used to buy a gun.
Multiple sheriffs in the state fear it’s unconstitutional, and don’t want to get caught up in enforcing something that’s illegal.
In question is the state’s Measure 114, which also bans magazines over 10 rounds and creates a statewide gun database.
Newsweek reported the Oregon State Sheriffs’ Association, representing the 36 elected sheriffs, fought the plan, saying it would hurt public safety by forcing agencies to create and fund a firearm permit process out of their budgets.
Now a number of sheriffs have pledged not to enforce the demands.
Sherman County Sheriff Brad Lohrey “said our office would not enforce Measure 114,” Undersheriff James Burgett told Newsweek on Tuesday. Another opponent is Jefferson County Sheriff Jason Pollock.
“The biggest thing is this does absolutely nothing to address the problem,” Sheriff Cody Bowen of Union County said in an interview with Fox News. “The problem that we have is not… magazine capacity. It’s not background checks. It’s a problem with mental health awareness. It’s a problem with behavior health illness.”
He warned the agenda is “an infringement on our Second Amendment.”
Malheur County Sheriff Brian Wolfe also said in an interview the ban is a problem.
“I don’t think this is superseding anything. I don’t believe that I am superseding state law by not enforcing it. Anybody in law enforcement, including the state police, including the governor, has to pick and choose what laws they are going to be able to enforce,” he said.
Michelle Duncan, the Linn County sheriff, posted on Facebook that her office is not enforcing the magazine capacity limits.
She explained the measure was poorly written and there “is still a lot that needs to be sorted out.”
Also read:
- Opinion: What would it take for elected officials to believe high earners are leaving Washington?Capital gains tax collections fell more than 50% in 2024 despite a 25% stock market gain that year.
- The Study of Sports Podcast May 13, 2026: The playoffs have started for Washington high school sports, plus how the three of us have adapted to new roles in our careersPaul Valencia, Cale Piland, and Tony Liberatore reunite to cover spring playoffs and Vancouver’s newest burger joint.
- Opinion: IBR creates 50,000 road refugeesLars Larson argues IBR’s tolling plan would push 50,000 daily commuters off I-5 onto I-205.
- Arrest made in 2025 Fern Prairie fatal collisionMatthew Kenne’s blood alcohol was above 0.08 when his Jeep struck a tree, killing 18-year-old Nicholas Ortiz.
- Opinion: It’s time to save taxpayers from Sound Transit’s strategic misrepresentationSound Transit’s ST3 rail program faces a $35 billion shortfall, and Southwest Washington taxpayers could bear new costs.
- Opinion: A tax scam based on a climate lieNancy Churchill argues the CCA costs families 52+ cents per gallon while missing every emissions target.
- C-TRAN board asks IBR to bring light rail to Library Square, with no protection for taxpayersC-TRAN’s board rejected 7-2 an amendment shielding taxpayers from extra costs tied to a light rail extension that could approach $1 billion.








