
The change, recommended by the Washington Policy for the last several years, is welcome and improves transparency into the legislative process
Mark Harmsworth
Washington Policy Center
Former Washington Policy Center (WPC) Director, Jason Mercier, finally saw Friday the practice of introducing title-only bills to avoid House rules on bill introductions, banned in the Washington House of Representatives. The Senate changed their rules several years ago. Mr. Mercier has for years recommended the change to improve government transparency.
In a series of rule changes, the House leadership added the section to ban title-only bills, now requiring at least section 1, typically the pre-ample to the bill, be included.

Title-only bills have been used in the past to introduce legislation to avoid session cutoff dates or avoid stating the full intent of the bill until the last minute. Title-only bills are essentially blank pieces of paper that provide a placeholder for action later in the legislative session. Not only are title-only bills not the norm across the country, they basically exist to circumvent Washington’s state constitutional protection for transparency on new bills introduced in the last 10 days of session. Budget bills are often introduced as title-only which severally limits the ability of a legislator to read through the budget prior to a vote.
The change ends the prior legislative games played to circumvent the bill transparency requirements guaranteed by Article 2, Section 36 of the state constitution.
The change, recommended by the Washington Policy for the last several years, is welcome and improves transparency into the legislative process.
Mark Harmsworth is the director of the Small Business Center at the Washington Policy Center.
Also read:
- Letter: ‘Now is the time to speak up, freedom is worth celebrating’Felida resident urges Clark County to preserve fireworks traditions for America’s 250th Independence Day celebration.
- Opinion: Wolves thriving, cattle producers failingWDFW celebrates 270 wolves in 49 packs while Washington agriculture posts negative $396 million farm income.
- Letter: The Climate Commitment Act – Washington’s high octane griftVancouver resident breaks down the hidden costs of Washington’s Climate Commitment Act and its impact on gas prices.
- Letter: The county manager gets a raise while taxpayers get a new taxCounty approves manager raise while claiming no general fund money exists for desperately needed deputies.
- Washington Supreme Court cases could decide fate of controversial income taxTwelve candidates compete for five Supreme Court seats as the court prepares to rule on the state’s new income tax.







